My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7152
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7152
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:39:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7152
Author
Holden, P. B.
Title
Relationship between Flows in the Yampa River and Success of Rare Fish Populations in the Green River System.
USFW Year
1980.
USFW - Doc Type
Logan, Utah.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />16 <br /> <br />Vanicek (1967) studied the Green River in Dinosaur National <br />Monument in 1964-1966. The major objective of his study was to deter- <br /> <br />mine the downstream effects of Flaming Gorge Dam, which was closed in <br />November 1962, on the fishes in the Green River. He sampled stations <br />which included Echo Park, the confluence of the Green and Yampa <br />rivers; Island Park, about 10 river miles below Echo Park; and Split <br />Mountain, about 10 miles below Island Park. He also sampled several <br /> <br />stations in the Green River between the mouth of the Yarnpa River and <br /> <br />Flaming Gorge Dam. His seining effort was high and included several days <br />of sampling at each station during 3 or 4 months each year. <br />Table 2 shows the young squawfish collected by Vanicek (1967). <br /> <br />I~ <br />I <br />, I <br /> <br />This data indicates that Colorado squawfish spawned in Dinosaur <br />National Monument all years between 1962-1966, but that success was <br /> <br />i <br />t <br /> <br />It should be noted that in 1965, 4 members of the Aqe class III, 1962 <br /> <br />! ;. <br />'I <br />i I <br />I <br /> <br />lower in 1965, and perhaps 1962, than the other years. The 1962 year <br /> <br />class was not sampled until age II, when low numbers are usually found. <br /> <br />cohort, were found, whereas in 1966, 5 members of the Age III, 1963 <br />cohort, were collected. Since the 1963 year class was supposedly <br />IIstrong" due to large numbers of Age I and II fish caught in 1964 and <br />1965, respectively, the capture of similar numbers of Age III fish in- <br />dicates that 1962 may also have been a good year for squawfish repro- <br /> <br />I <br />II, <br /> <br />J: <br />:11 <br />:1 <br />II, <br /> <br />ductive success. <br /> <br />Figure 8 is the length/frequencies of young squawfish presented <br />by Vanicek (1967). Collections in 1964 in June show large numbers of <br />Age I fish which ranged from 30 mm to 80 rom. In 1965, Age I fish were <br />30-50 mm and Age II fish were indicated to be 55-110 mm in June. <br /> <br /> <br />,~. <br /> <br />f <br />t <br /> <br />~, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.