Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-r <br /> <br />squawfish for that matter, in these adjacent areas suggests either <br />the small fish used the main channel, which is highly unlikely, <br />or moved considerably within the sample backwater. It would ap- <br />pear the latter possibility is most likely. The failure to find <br />any young-of-the-year squawfish in areas of current supports the <br />possibility of their moving little up or down the river during the <br />time of the study. <br />The data from this 2-1/2 day study of squawfish movement are <br />inconclusive. Movement is indicated, but the extent of the move- <br />ment is not known. Data from collections in the vicinity of the <br />sample backwater suggested that young-of-the-year squawfish are <br />seldom found in an area of current. This indicates that the fish <br />move little between habitats, and that movement within the sample <br />backwater may best explain the lack of young-of-the-year recap- <br />tures. <br /> <br />Comoetition and Predation <br />The data presented in Table 4 show that rare and introduced <br />species use the same microhabitat and suggest that competition <br />and predation are possible. Young exotic species dominated the <br />young-of-the-year collections of both squawfish and humpback chubs, <br />as well as juvenile chu~s. Juvenile squawfish associated primar- <br />ily with native species. The degree that this potential competi- <br />tion-predation limits rare fish populations is not known, nor is <br />there sufficient data available at this time to suggest competitive <br />mechani sms . <br /> <br />." .......)-. <br /> <br />" <br />