My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7153
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7153
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:39:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7153
Author
Holden, P. B.
Title
Study of the Habitat Use and Movement of the Rare Fishes in the Green River, Utah.
USFW Year
1978.
USFW - Doc Type
Logan, Utah.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />larger squawfish in the Green River may change habitat preference <br />with. season. During high water (spring and early summer) back- <br />waters appear to be preferred; whereas, during low water (fall) <br />eddies and runs are predominantly used. Kidd (1977) indicated <br />that squawfish used backwaters almost exclusively in the Colorado <br />River near Grand Junction, although times of capture were not noted. <br />Small humpback chubs have s~mi1ar habitat preferences to small <br />squawfish but use more of a variety of areas, especially eddies. <br />No previous study has reported on preferred habitats of small <br />humpback chubs. <br />Habitat preferences of adult humpback chubs have generally <br />included eddies near fast current (Holden and Stalnaker, 1975) <br />and/or depths of 20+ feet (Kidd, 1977). The data collected during <br />the present study show no distinct preference for either depth or <br />velocity, although some humpbacks were caught in very fast cur- <br />rents (2.5 fps) and in very deep areas (20 ft.). <br />Rare Fish Movements <br />The three young-of-the-year squawfish recaptured in the sam- <br />ple backwater provide little data on movement. The fact that a <br />relatively large number of fish were marked and that successive <br />samples ~found re1ati vely large numbers of unmarked fi sh, indi cates <br />several possibilities. First, a fairly large population is indi- <br />cated. Secondly, failure to recapture marked fish suggests either <br />low sampling efficiency or absence of marked fish. The mouth of <br /> <br />~~ -, , . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.