My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7752
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7752
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:39:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7752
Author
Stanford, J. A.
Title
Instream Flows to Assist the Recovery of Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
Review and Synthesis of Ecological Information, Issues, Methods and Rationale.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Incremental Flow Modeling <br />In spite of the inherently variable nature of lotic ecosystems, the need to describe continuous <br />functions between flow and habitat is widely perceived, along with the assumption that aquatic biota <br />in rivers are primarily limited by availability of physical habitat. Physical variables, such as <br />temperature, velocities, size of gravel, cover, etc., obviously vary with flow. So models were <br />developed in an attempt to describe change in these habitat variables in increments of flow. This <br />vastly more complicated approach still implies that as habitat increases so will fish carrying <br />capacity, and hence, fish populations. <br />By far the most used (Reiser et al. 1989a) and most sophisticated incremental method is that <br />developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Bovee 1982). This concept is called the Instream <br />Flow Incremental Methodology (lFIM) and is a collection of computer programs and analytical <br />procedures designed to predict changes in fish or invertebrate habitats in a "representative" stream <br />reach due to flow changes. The IFIM has three major components. I) Transects across a <br />"representative" reach are divided into cells (intervals) in which depth, velocity, cover value and often <br />substratum roughness or quality are measured or simulated. These variables are assumed to be <br />independent of one another. 2) The range of velocities, depths and cover or substratum used by the <br />biota are determined by relating occurrence of various life history stages (e.g., YOY, juveniles, <br />adults, spawners) of target species to the "hydraulic" variables. In other words, life stages of target <br />biota are sampled or otherwise monitored (fish preferences are often detennined from animals fitted <br />with radio transmitters) across the range of the hydraulic variables to derive "habitat suitability <br />curves." Intuitively this is a logical approach, but it is often biased by sampling error, especially in <br />large, deep and often turbid rivers where the biota are difficult to capture or see. 3) The net <br />suitability of use of a given locality (transect cell) is quantified by a parameter called weighted <br />usable area (WUA), which is a derived relationship between plan area of the transect cell (area <br />available) and the habitat preference indices (from suitability curves) for velocity, depth and <br />substratum. The WUA is calculated cell by cell and summed for the entire reach and over a range <br />of discharges. Hence, increments of WUA for a stream become a continuous function of <br /> <br />48 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.