My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7752
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7752
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:39:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7752
Author
Stanford, J. A.
Title
Instream Flows to Assist the Recovery of Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
Review and Synthesis of Ecological Information, Issues, Methods and Rationale.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.. <br /> <br />correlated with diversity and abundance of native fishes and negatively correlated with diversity and <br />abundance of nonnative fish. The strong inference is that the nonnatives are maladapted to survive <br />intense and frequent (annual, at least) flooding in contrast to the natives. Having fewer predators <br />increases recruitment of natives, and over time allows the natives to persist in greater abundance <br />" . <br /> <br />than nonnatives (Figure 15). The work of Meffe and Minckley included the Virgin River and other <br />tributaries of the Colorado River, but none in the upper basin. Thus, while the data are not directly <br />applicable, the relationship probably holds. Indeed, Hawkins and Nesler (1991) correlated lower <br />ratios of nonnatives to natives with high peak flows in the Yampa River and red shiner populations <br />declined after years of high spring flows in the Colorado River (Osmundson and Kaeding 1991). <br />A <br /> <br />Ie <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />/ <br />./ <br />x-.... <br /> <br /> <br />.,-,.---- <br />- <br />"" <br />/./ <br />/ <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br />COo <br /> <br /> <br />I.s <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />A <br />A /1 A <br />x -.... I / 1 / I <br />',//1/1 " <br />L- L-" 1--"" <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />nME . <br /> <br />Figure 15. Graphic models of the dynamic relationship between native and nonnative fishes in <br />regulated (A) and unregulated. (B) arid-land streams. A: In a regulated stream, native fishes (solid <br />line) typically decline and disappear upon introduction (x) of nonnative fishes (dashed line). B: In <br />a free-flooding stream, native fishes similarly decline after nonnatives appear, but flooding (arrows) <br />reduces nonnative populations to levels that pennit recovery of native fishes. During intertlood <br />periods, population size and range of nonnative fishes again expand and negatively impact native <br />species until the next flood. If flooding occurs frequently enough, long-term coexistence may <br />occur as a dynamic equilibrium. K = carrying capacity of the stream for native fishes. (From <br />Minckley and Meffe 1987.) <br /> <br />37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.