My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7752
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7752
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:39:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7752
Author
Stanford, J. A.
Title
Instream Flows to Assist the Recovery of Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
Review and Synthesis of Ecological Information, Issues, Methods and Rationale.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />zoo benthos production. Indeed, zoobenthos species richness and biomass declines downstream <br />from the rhithron-potamon transition as the river bottom changes from coarse to [me substratum <br />(Caner and Lamarra 1983, Ward and Stanford 1991). <br />These studies and discussions with researchers suggest that food webs are more stable, <br />complex and productive in the upstream reaches of the potamon, associated with cobble substratum <br />within the channel (e.g., Yampa Canyon, 15-mile reach, lower Gunnison River). In the alluvial <br />segments of downstream reaches on both the Green and Colorado Rivers, productive food webs <br />may only be present in low velocity backwaters and the few cobble bars. Studies to date are <br />inconclusive as to exactly how productive backwater environments actually may be, but algae, <br />zooplankton and mud-dwelling midge (chironomidae) larvae are present in backwaters on the Green <br />River (Grabowski and Hiebert 1989). I would expect that naturally functioning backwaters (Le., <br />seasonally flooded and continuously connected to the channel) to contain rooted aquatic vegetation <br />(i.e., as opposed to encroaching riparian vegetation, discussed below) which provide substratum for <br />algae, odonates, snails, mayflies and caddisflies, in addition to forms living on the bottom (e.g., <br />oligochaetes and midges). Organic detritus originating in the river channel (e.g., periphyton, <br />drifting leaves) also may be deposited in low velocity habitats providing substratum for <br />detritivorous insects and fishes. Hence, backwater food webs typically have abundant forage for <br />small fish, such as YOY squawfish, that are in turn available to larger predators. A large body of <br />literature supports the concept that naturally functioning floodplain wetlands of rivers are very <br />productive and an essential component of the life history of fishes that migrate between channel and <br />floodplain wetlands (e.g., Junk et al. 1989, Ward 1989). <br />Because they fringe the channel rather than extend across it, backwaters and associated <br />floodplain wetlands are more ephemeral than cobble bars, which remain partially inundated even at <br />the lowest flows. Moreover, backwater and wetland (flooded bottomland) environments in many <br />unconstrained (floodplain) areas of the Upper Colorado River Basin have been ecologically <br /> <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.