My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7752
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7752
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:39:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7752
Author
Stanford, J. A.
Title
Instream Flows to Assist the Recovery of Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
Review and Synthesis of Ecological Information, Issues, Methods and Rationale.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />, <br /> <br />Dynamic Relationships Between Flow. ChanneIGeomoq>holo~y and Food Webs <br />The distribution, abundance and life histories of the endangered fishes appear to be strongly <br />influenced by availability of physical habitats that are created and maintained by flow dynamics in <br />time and space (Figure 6). Indeed, squawfish only spawn on clean cobble on specific bars in the <br />sediment-laden river segments of the Upper Colorado system. Hence, a fundamental process- <br />response relationship involves the movement of the fish to the bars in concert with flows that first <br />form the bars and then flush sediment off of cobble substratum so that the fish can spawn <br />successfully (Figure 2) (Tyus 1990, Harvey et ale in press). Humpback chub primarily occur in <br />eddies and other hydraulically complex habitats found in constrained channels in the steeper <br />gradient segments within canyons (Figure 2) (Kaeding and Zimmerman 1983, Kaeding et al. 1990, <br />Karp and Tyus 1990, Valdez et al. 1990). Squawfish and razorback sucker are almost always <br />captured in low or zero velocity habitats (Tyus 1984, Osmundson and Kaeding 1989), which occur <br />within the active channel (e.g., eddies) or exist as backwaters (e.g, back-bar channels) or floodplain <br />wetlands (i.e., flooded bottomIands) that are continually or seasonally attached to the active channel. <br />Squawfish (Tyus 1991a and b), and perhaps razorback sucker as well (Minckley et al. 1991), must <br />have access to low velocity environments to mature. This strongly implies that low velocity habitats <br />are important feeding, or resting areas or both; but, it does not imply that rivers of consistently low <br />velocity or volume are most suited to the endangered fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br />Low velocity environments are formed and maintained by complex hydrologic processes <br />that involve the frequency and duration of high velocity, peak flows and associated flux of sediment <br />through the stream segment (cf., Andrews and Nelson 1989). Hence, occurrence of low velocity <br />habitats is dynamic in space and time and strongly linked to the flow regime, sediment supply and <br />channel morphology. Numbers and area of low velocity environments used by squawfish larvae, <br />juveniles and sometimes adults in the alluvial Jensen and Ouray areas of the Green River (Tyus and <br />Haines 1991) apparently are maximized at a given time at river discharge of 1381 cfs (numbers) <br />and 1687 cfs (area) (pucherelli et al. 1990). However, it must be kept in mind that a river stage- <br />backwater relationship observed on a particular year is determined by the volume <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.