Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Long-term monitoring data strongly indicate to researchers in the recovery program that <br />numbers of larvae and YOY squawfish and subsequent year classes are highest when intermediate <br />(about the long-term average) peak flows occur during spring runoff. Numbers of YOY were <br />substantially lower on years of very high spring flows (e.g., flow peaks of record in 1983 and 1984 <br /> <br />at the State line gauge, Figure 4) (Osmundson and Kaeding 1991), owing either to poor spawning <br />conditions or mortality associated with flushing effects of high runoff. However, Tyus and Haines <br />(1991) obseIVed higher recruitment ofYOY on low flow years in the Green River. Low recruitment <br />of YOY on low flow years in the Colorado River may be related to lack of suitable habitat, either for <br />spawning, or rearing or both. An alternate interpretation of Figure 4 is that the extremely high <br />flows of 1983-84 created or rejuvenated substantial amount of spawning habitat which was available <br />but gradually deteriorating during 1985-88. Regardless of how the relationship is interpreted with <br />respect to the peak (1983-84) and low (1982) flow events, it is fairly clear that production of young <br />squawfish can occur over a very wide range of spring flows (Le., the recruitment threshold of YOY <br />is very wide). Like McAda and Kaeding (1991), I conclude that squawfish spawning may be much <br /> <br />less site-specific than is suggested by the literature or a very wide range of preferred spawning <br />conditions exist on the spawning bars where squawfish are routinely found (e.g., Cleopatra's Couch <br />Bar on the Yampa; Three Fords on the Green). <br />The life history strategy of squawfish appears to be strongly influenced by the propensity <br />of the larvae and juveniles to drift far downstream from the spawning site; survivors subsequently <br />move back upstream as they mature. Adults, especially large fish (Figure 5), are most commonly <br />found at or near the potamon-rhithron transition zone in the Yampa and Colorado Rivers. <br />Recruitment of adults presumably is lower for cohorts spawned on low flow years, owing to <br />reduced spawning success to start with and increased predation pressure per fish during each <br />subsequent life history stage. Predation on YOY and juveniles may be more intense on low flow <br />years when habitats are confined. The positive relationship between year class strength and peak <br />discharge generally seems to hold for both the Green River and Colorado Rivers (Tyus and Karp <br />1989, 1991, Osmundson and Kaeding 1991) and also applies to humpback chub in the Grand <br /> <br />14 <br />