My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7752
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7752
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:39:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7752
Author
Stanford, J. A.
Title
Instream Flows to Assist the Recovery of Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
Review and Synthesis of Ecological Information, Issues, Methods and Rationale.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />, <br /> <br />preliminary conclusions. Written reviews of fIrst and second drafts of this report were provided by <br />the expert panel and members of the Instream Flow Subcommittee. Many other scientists and <br />. experts working in the Upper Colorado River Basin also kindly provided written comments on the <br />second draft.. All the comments I received were insightful, and I attempted to address all concerns <br />that I felt would improve the report. I was especially cognizant of comments by the expert panel, <br />and their input is evident throughout the document. However, I take full responsibility for the <br /> <br />accuracy and completeness of information and conclusions contained herein. <br /> <br />Ecolo~cal Context for Instream Flow Analysis <br />I approached this analysis from an ecosystem perspective, recognizing that ecological <br />processes or management actions in one subbasin or river reach may influence processes in others <br /> <br />(Le., system components are ecologically interconnected). For example, migrations by fIshes <br />ecologically interconnect the entire river system, except as influenced by dams which usually block <br /> <br />upstream movements. Dams and reservoirs rarely prevent fIshes from moving downstream, <br /> <br />although monality may be high in passage and conditions downstream from the dams mayor may <br />not favor colonization by fishes living upstream from the impoundment. My point is that reaches <br />in the river system where the endangered fishes live (Le., downstream from the larger dams) are <br />hydrologically and ecologically connected to upstream reaches, where the endangered fishes may <br />have never existed. Interactions between flow dynamics and channel and floodplain features vital to <br />the existence of the endangered fishes also occur from river reach to catchment scales and represent <br />another example of ecosystem connectivity. Hence, the ecosystem in this analysis included the <br />entire Upper Colorado River Basin (Figure 1). <br /> <br />Uncertainty exists as to whether ecological and/or water regulation processes in Lake <br />Powell have significant influences on the ecology of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Certainly <br />regulation of Lake Powell is influenced by delivery of water from the Upper Colorado River Basin <br />and it is likely that the reselVoir is a source of nonnative fishes that may migrate upstream, thereby <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.