My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9317 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9317 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:35:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9317
Author
Spahr, N. E., L. E. Apodaca, J. R. Deacon, J. B. Bails, N. C. Bauch, C. M. Smith and N. E. Driver.
Title
Water Quality in the Upper Colorado River Basin, Colorado, 1996-98.
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Colorado Plateau and the igneous- <br />metamorphic geology of the South- <br />ern Rocky Mountains. Agricul- <br />tural return flows also contribute to <br />the greater sediment concentrations <br />measured at the agricultural sites. <br /> <br />The reference site in the Colo- <br />rado Plateau also had elevated sedi- <br />ment concentrations. Any rain or <br />snowmelt event in these areas tends <br />to substantially increase the sedi- <br />ment concentrations of streams and <br />rivers because of the high erodibil- <br />ity of the soils. <br /> <br />Z 200 <br />0 <br />~ 180 <br />a:: <br />t- <br />z 160 <br />w <br />Ua:: <br />Zw <br />Ot- 140 <br />U:J <br />t-a:: 120 <br />Zw <br />Wo.. <br />~C/) 100 <br />0::; <br />~~ 80 <br />Oel <br />~3 <br />m~ 60 <br />o..z <br />C/)- 40 <br />::J <br />C/) <br />Z 20 <br /><{ <br />15 <br />w 0 <br />::; <br /> <br />Colorado Plateau <br />.-- <br /> - <br /> .-- <br /> Southern <br /> Rocky <br />, Mountains <br /> - <br /> <br />'" .& '" '" '" <br />.& ii) .& .& .& <br />ii) l'l ii) ii) ii) <br />co " c: 5l <br />.3 c: '" ell <br />~ ::J .0 ::J <br />:; .2! -c :5 -c <br />0 " c: c: <br />.g, a:: ell ell <br /><{ -' -' <br /> "0 "0 <br /> " ~ <br /> X <br /> ~ ~ <br /> <br />Figure 15. Suspended-sediment <br />concentrations were greatest in the <br />agricultural areas of the Colorado <br />Plateau. <br /> <br /> <br />Sediment and water-quality sampling at Reed <br />Wash. (Photograph by Norman Spahr, U.S. Geolog- <br />ical Survey.) <br /> <br />,'. <br />'. <br /> <br />BIOLOGICAL MEASURES INDICATE <br />THAT UCOL AGRICULTURAL AND <br />COLORADO PLATEAU MIXED LAND- <br />USE SITES RANK AMONG THE MORE <br />DEGRADED SITES NATIONALLY <br /> <br />The elevated nutrient and sediment concentrations found in the agricul- <br />tural and surrounding areas of the Colorado Plateau help to explain the <br />prevalence of more tolerant biological species. Algal, invertebrate, and fish <br />communities in the Colorado Plateau generally consist of species more tol- <br />erant to nutrients and sediments. These result in higher degradation rank- <br />ings for all three biological measures. The biological measures in the <br />Colorado Plateau indicate that agricultural and mixed land-use sites in the <br />VCaL are above the national average in terms of degradation. These rank- <br />ings compare VCaL agricultural sites to other NAWQA agricultural sites <br />and VCaL mixed land-use sites to other NAWQA mixed land-use sites <br />nationally. <br /> <br />Biological indicator <br /> <br />Site name <br /> <br />Algal <br />status <br /> <br />Invertebrate <br />status <br /> <br />Fish <br />status <br /> <br />Dry Creek <br />(agricultural site) <br /> <br />Reed Wash <br />(agricultural site) <br />Colorado River near Cameo <br />(Colorado Plateau mixed land use) <br /> <br />D <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br /> <br />II <br />II <br />D <br />II <br />II <br /> <br />II <br />II <br />D <br />II <br />D <br /> <br />Gunnison River near Grand Junction <br />(Colorado Plateau mixed land use) <br /> <br />Colorado River at State line <br />(Colorado Plateau mixed land use) <br /> <br />EXPLANATION <br />Middle 50 percent nationally <br /> <br />Highest 25 percent nationally, most degraded sites <br /> <br />D <br />. <br /> <br />Explanation of Biological Rankings <br />The three selected biological indicators respond to changes in stream degra- <br />dation. Degradation can result from a variety of factors that modify habitat or <br />other environmental features such as land use, water chemistry, and flow. Algal <br />status focuses on the changes in the percentage of certain algae in response to <br />increasing siltation and often is positively correlated with higher nutrient <br />concentrations in many regions of the Nation. Invertebrate status is the average <br />of II invertebrate metrics that summarize changes in richness, tolerance, <br />trophic conditions, and dominance associated with water-quality degradation. <br />Fish status focuses on changes in the percentage of tolerant fish species that <br />make up the total number of fish. "Tolerant" fish are reported to thrive in <br />degraded water quality. For all indicators, higher values indicate degraded water <br />quality. <br /> <br />Major Findings 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.