Laserfiche WebLink
<br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />(C <br />~~ <br />z::::; <br />Qffi <br />~c.. <br />(COO <br />~ ~ 0.1 - <br />W(C <br />~~ <br />O::J <br />()~ <br /> <br />~. ~~i~~a~~k~:~UICh <br /> <br />(reference site) <br /> <br />t (~~;~~~~~) <br /> <br />Gore Creek <br />(urban site)" <br /> <br />+ r <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />0.Q1 <br /> <br />+ Maximum <br />Median <br />- Minimum <br />_ Median less than <br />laboratory reporing level <br /> <br />0.001 <br /> <br />NITRITE <br />PLUS NITRATE <br /> <br />TOTAL DISSOLVED ORTHO, <br />PHOSPHORUS PHOSPHORUS PHOSPHATE <br /> <br />AMMONIA <br /> <br />Figure 7. Concentrations of nitrite plus nitrate and total phosphorus were <br />greater at sites with urban development (Gore Creek and East River) than at <br />the reference site (Colorado River below Baker Gulch). Sites shown in order of <br />increasing urban development. A log scale is used due to the large range of <br />concentrations. <br /> <br /> a: 5.0 70 o Mayilies, Stoneflies. Caddisflies <br /> w <br /> f-- <br /> w 4.5 z OMidges <br /> ::;; 0 60 <br /> w 4.0 f= <br /> a: iii <br /> <( <br />-::> 3.5 0 50 <br />Wo ll. <br />::;;U) 3.0 ::;; <br />3 ffi 0 <br /> U 40 <br />~ll. 2.5 f-- <br /> z <br />0U) w 30 <br />- a: <br />lllw 2.0 U <br />-'f-- a: <br /><(w 1.5 w <br />C) ::;; ll. 20 <br />-' - z <br /><( f-- 1.0 <( <br />z <br /> w is 10 <br /> U O. 5 w <br /> U ::;; <br /> ii'i 0 0 <br /> ::> <br /> U Colorado East Gore Colorado East Gore <br /> ~ River below River Creek River below River Creek <br /> Baker Gulch (urban (urban Baker Gulch (urban (urban <br /> (reference site) site) site) (reference site) site) site) <br /> <br />Figure 8. Algal biovolume (the amount of algae) was greater at Gore Creek, <br />which also has greater urban development. The percentage of mayflies, <br />stonetlies, and caddistlies decreased, and the percentage of midges (indicative <br />of more degraded water quality) increased with urban development. Sites shown <br />in order of increasing urban development. <br /> <br /> 0.28 - Nitrite plus nitrate East River 3,000 <br /> 0.26 Instantaneous discharge <br /> 0.24 ~ <br /> WO <br />a: 0.22 C)z <br />zW a:o <br />-f-- <br />z~ 0.20 2,000 <(u <br /> :r:w <br />oa: 0.18 UU) <br />~~ ~a: <br /> Ow <br />a:U) 0.16 U)ll. <br />f--::;; ::>f-- <br />z<( 0.14 OW <br />Wa: <br />UC) WW <br />z- 0.12 I 1,000 z"- <br />0-' <(u <br />U=' f--- <br />0.10 Zlll <br />::;; <(::> <br /> 0.08 f--U <br /> U) <br /> 0.06 J ~ <br /> 0.04 .? 0 <br /> OCT JAN APR JULY OCT JAN APR JULY OCT JAN APR JULY OCT <br /> I WATER YEAR 1996 WATER YEAR 1997 I WATER YEAR 1998 I <br /> <br />Figure 9. Nutrient concentrations were greatest during the late winter low-flow <br />period prior to peak snowmelt runoff. This pattern was similar for total phosphorus <br />at East River and for nitrite plus nitrate and total phosphorus at Gore Creek. <br /> <br />(mayflies, stoneflies, and caddis- <br />flies) was greater at sites with less <br />urban influence (Colorado River <br />below Baker Gulch, fig. 8). The <br />percentage of midges (insects gen- <br />erally tolerant of pollution) <br />increased with increasing urban <br />influence (East River and Gore <br />Creek sites, fig. 8). Even though <br />the percentage of midges was <br />greater at Gore Creek, the inverte- <br />brate status of Gore Creek was less <br />degraded than other urban sites in <br />the NA WQA Program (p. 8). <br /> <br />Nutrient concentrations were <br />generally largest during winter. <br />Concentrations of nitrite plus <br />nitrate and dissolved and total <br />phosphorus were greatest during <br />the late winter low-flow period <br />prior to snowmelt runoff (fig. 9). <br />With the onset of snowmelt runoff, <br />nutrient concentrations were <br />diluted. Algal uptake of nutrients <br />during warm weather (July- <br />October) probably lower concen- <br />trations during the summer. With <br />reduced dilution and diminished <br />algal uptake, nutrient concentra- <br />tions increase again during the win- <br />ter low-flow period. <br /> <br />Ground-water studies investi- <br />gated the effects of urban land <br />use on water in selected alluvial <br />aquifers. Although many commu- <br />nities in the VCOL rely on surface <br />water as their primary source of <br />drinking water, a few mountain <br />towns and many thousands of <br />individual homes in the Southern <br />Rocky Mountains use ground <br />water as their primary water <br />source. Effects of urban land use <br />can be indicated by elevated con- <br />centrations of nitrate, detections of <br />synthetic organic compounds (pes- <br />ticides and VOCs), and bacteria. <br /> <br />Major Findings 7 <br />