My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7843
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7843
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:35:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7843
Author
Stalnaker, C. B., et al.
Title
The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology, A Primer for IFIM.
USFW Year
1995.
USFW - Doc Type
Biological Report 29,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />28 BIOLOGICAL REpORT 29 <br /> <br />Chapter 5. The Application of IFIM <br /> <br />The IFIM is meant to be implemented in five <br />sequential phases: problem identification, study <br />planning, study implementation, alternatives <br />analysis, and problem resolution. Collectively, <br />these phases encompass the individual steps <br />shown in the previous flowchart (Fig. 1.1). This <br />chapter summarizes each phase, telling who the <br />major players are for each phase and what is to be <br />accomplished in that phase. Two things should <br />become apparent as you read about the five phases <br />of applying IFIM. First, each phase must precede <br />the remaining phases, though cycling through <br />them will be a necessity as projects increase in <br />complexity. Skipping or minimizing any step is <br />likely to result in an unsatisfactory assessment. <br />Second, full and open communication is an essen- <br />tial ingredient of each phase. Such communication <br />will help ensure that all parties accept the IFIM <br />process and have a positive view of what should be <br />mutually beneficial results. In some ways, commu- <br />nication is an ingredient as well as a product of <br />each phase because a successful application of <br />IFIM should result in mutually acceptable deci- <br />sions. <br /> <br />Problem Identification <br /> <br />After a proposed change in the water manage- <br />ment system becomes known, the first ppase of an <br />IFIM assessment begins. This phase has two <br />parts, a legal-institutional analysis and a physical <br />analysis. The interagency group should perform <br />the legal and institutional analysis. This analysis <br />identifies all affected or interested parties, their <br />concerns, information needs, and relative influ- <br />ence or power, as well as the likely decision process <br />(Le., Is it more likely to be a brokered or arbitrated <br />decision?). Thus, phase one will result in a better <br />understanding of the proposed project, the likely <br />impacts, and the objectives of all interested par- <br />ties. This understanding sets the stage for multi- <br />objective planning that will encourage analyses <br />other than just the proposed project operation. <br />Also, negotiating the details at an early stage <br /> <br />provides the foundation for continued successful <br />negotiation throughout the assessment. <br />In the second part of phase one, the physical <br />analysis determines (1) the physical location and <br />geographic extent of probable physical and chemi- <br />cal changes to the system, and (2) the aquatic (and <br />perhaps recreational) resources of greatest con- <br />cern, along with their respective management ob- <br />jectives. Problem identification is often accom- <br />plished with a scoping meeting involving the <br />management and regulatory agencies likely to be <br />involved with the decision. A preferred alternative <br />may be identified by the project proponent, and the <br />consequences of this alternative are translated <br />into a hydrologic time series that assumes the <br />project is in place and operating as proposed. The <br />group should also jointly develop a baseline hydro- <br />logic time series representing either the status quo <br />or another baseline that is mutually acceptable. <br />The two (or more) hydrologic time series, in a <br />preliminary sense, establish the basis for the next <br />phase-study planning. <br /> <br />Study Planning <br /> <br />Carefully planning the course of an IFIM as- <br />sessment is critical. The focus of this phase is to <br />identify what information is needed to address the <br />concerns of each group, what information already <br />exists, and what new information must be ob- <br />tained. Study planning details should dominate <br />the discussions and result in a concise, written <br />plan documenting who is going to do what, when, <br />where, how, and for how much money. The study <br />plan must be feasible, given the decision schedule, <br />and the human and financial resources available. <br />The interdisciplinary planning team must build <br />on the objectives and information needs of each <br />party. The team should not try to predict the <br />outcome of a study but focus on data collection and <br />the methods to be used. Proper planning will lead <br />to the collective identification of (1) the pertinent <br />temporal and spatial scale of evaluations, (2) the <br />most important variables for which information is <br />needed, and (3) how information will be obtained <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.