Laserfiche WebLink
PURPOSE AND NEED <br />The purpose of this environmental assessment is to select an acceptable <br />procedure for disposal of surplus captive-reared endangered fish. A need has <br />been identified for the development of captive broodstocks of endangered <br />Colorado River fishes that are genetically similar to the wild endangered fish <br />stock that was used as founders. Captive broodstocks serve as an "insurance <br />policy" if the wild stocks become extirpated and provide fish for experimental <br />studies that are part of recovery efforts . Since attrition rates are not <br />known in captive propagation of the endangered Colorado River fishes, more <br />fish are produced than are needed in the recovery effort to compensate for <br />high attrition rates. <br />Many propagation activities may produce more fish than are needed to meet <br />specified requirements. This additional production allows the hatchery <br />manager to compensate for unknown or unpredictable attrition rates to ensure <br />that specified requirements are met. Planned captive propagation minimizes <br />the production of endangered fish that will be excess to Program needs. <br />However, fish that are surplus to actual need become a liability to the <br />Recovery Program because they require valuable resources (e.g., people, <br />facilities, and funds). Therefore, Recovery Program participants developed <br />"Guidelines for the Disposition of Captive-Reared Endangered Fish" <br />(Guidelines) to address this issue. <br />This Environmental Assessment compares several alternatives that could be used <br />in the disposition of captive-reared endangered fish, including the <br />Guidelines, and discusses the potential impacts of each alternative. <br />BACKGROUND <br />Water development in the Upper Colorado River Basin has resulted in changes in <br />the historic water regime of this important river system that, in turn, has <br />affected water temperatures and habitat such as backwaters and flooded <br />bottomlands that were apparently crucial to successive recruitment of the <br />endangered fishes. Construction of dams in the upper basin also blocked <br />natural migrations of endemic fishes. Subsequently, non-native fishes were <br />introduced, either intentionally or accidentally, that have become established <br />in the river and are suspected to be competitors with, or predators on, the <br />native fishes in this unique river system. <br />These changes have resulted in the razorback sucker (Xvrauchen texanus), <br />bonytail (Gila ele ans), humpback chub (Gila c ha), and Colorado squawfish <br />(Ptychocheilus lucius) being listed as "endangered" under the Endangered <br />Species Act of 1973, as amended. These endemic fishes once played a positive <br />and important role in the lives of Upper Colorado River Basin residents by <br />providing sport fishing opportunities and food (Quartarone 1993). Although <br />spawning has been documented and larvae or juveniles of some of the endangered <br />fishes have been collected in the upper basin, the primary limiting factor is <br />poor survival in the early life stages that results in inadequate recruitment <br />to maintain self-sustaining wild stocks.