My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7758
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7758
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:34:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7758
Author
Stanford, J. A. and P. C. Nelson.
Title
Instream Flows to Assist the Recovery of Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
INSTREAM FLOWS TO ASSIST THE RECOVERY OF ENDANGERED FISHES 9 <br />Gunnison (i.e., downstream from the Redlands <br />diversion dam; a few are isolated upstream), and <br />mainstem Colorado rivers (downstream from the <br />Grand Valley diversion dams; Fig. 1). <br />Colorado squawfish are long-lived piscivores <br />that grow to more than a meter in length and <br />exhibit long migrations (e.g., between White and <br />Yampa rivers; Tyus 1990) associated with 15-20° <br />C isotherms (my interpretation based on data in <br />Tyus 1984, 1990). The fish spawn on chute chan- <br />nels (Harvey et al. in press) that form on specific <br />alluvial bars in the Yampa and Green rivers (Fig. <br />2) in association with the decline of spring runoff <br />and spates (Nesler et al. 1988; Tyus 1990). Eggs <br />of squawfish hatch within about 5 days after <br />spawning at 20-22° C, which is the critical tem- <br />perature for successful reproduction (Hamman <br />1981; Haynes et al. 1984; Tyus and McAda 1984; <br />Marsh 1985). Upon hatching, larvae drift down- <br />stream (Fig. 3), where they are entrained in back- <br />water nursery habitats in alluvial reaches (shown <br />generally in Fig. 1). In lab experiments, young of <br />500 <br />400 <br />300 <br />200 <br />100 <br />M <br />E <br /> <br />220 <br />4De-erikomdoe <br />1s0 <br />140 100 60 '•4 <br />1985 <br />20 Z Meybeu <br />20 25 30 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 10 <br />JUN JUL AUG <br />the year (YOY) prefer and grow best at 25° C <br />(Black and Bulkley 1985). The YOY and juveniles <br />are most often found in specific low velocity envi- <br />ronments, created by the complex relationship of <br />flow and channel geomorphology (Fig. 2). These <br />nursery and rearing sites also are inhabited by <br />native and nonnative fishes, particularly flannel- <br />mouth sucker (Catostomus latipinnis), roundtail <br />chub, green sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus), red <br />shiner (Cyprinella lutrensis), sand shiner (Notro- <br />pis stramineus), and channel catfish (Ictalurus <br />punctatus), that compete with the endangered <br />fishes for available food resources or prey on them <br />directly (Valdez and Wick 1983; Karp and Tyus <br />1990). Adult squawfish also prefer areas of the <br />channel that are braided and complex, where low <br />velocity habitats (e.g., eddies, pools, and slow <br />runs) are abundant. Like razorback sucker, adult <br />squawfish tend to move in and out of large back- <br />waters that form on downstream ends of backbar <br />channels and terrace- or wall-based channels <br />(Fig. 2), which remain connected to the main <br />500 <br />so z 400 <br /> M <br />60 E 300 <br />., 3 <br />40 O, L6 200 <br />20 P* <br /> 100 <br />140 260 <br />Deerbdge <br />120 <br />Z 220 <br />1001 <br />q M 180 <br />3 140 <br />? <br /> <br />80 o <br />60 <br />b <br />100 . <br /> <br />Maybell <br /> 60 <br /> <br />40 <br />20 r <br />20 20 25 30 5 10 15 <br />JUN JUL <br />so z <br />3 <br />60 <br />400, <br />20 ? <br />50 <br />1986 <br />40 e <br />3 <br />30 <br />0 <br />20' <br />10 <br />5 10 <br />AUG <br />Fig. 3. Relationships of Colorado River squawfish spawning dates (vertical bars, data derived from larval drift rates <br />adjusted for hatching time) to Yampa River flows measured at the Deerlodge and Maybell gauges in 4 years. <br />Number of fish represents number of larval fish sampled and distributed according to estimated spawning date <br />(from Nesler et al. 1988). <br />20 25 30 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 10 <br />JUN JUL AUG <br />20 25 30 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 10 <br />JUN JUL AUG
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.