My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9327
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9327
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:34:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9327
Author
Starnes, W. C.
USFW Year
1995.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A better (or older?) marker possibility is the 11111 allele at <br />the PGM locus (Fig. 11). That allele is, on the average, quite <br />common in samples from throughout the Gila Basin and adjacent <br />populations in the lower Colorado Basin but is rare to absent in <br />upper basin samples and therefore is strongly correlated with the <br />range of intermedia. It is absent in samples from populations in! <br />the lower Colorado Basin that may have been effectively isolated <br />for many millenia (Chevelon Cr. in Little Colorado syst. and <br />Pahranagat Valley). It is also absent from one Gila Basin <br />sample, from Cienega Creek (morphologically assignable to <br />intermedia), which however has considerable evidence of <br />bottlenecking as previously discussed and has become fixed for <br />the alternate allele. The distribution of this PGM allele is <br />consistent with having an ancestral distribution in the Gila <br />Basin (associated with the genome of intermedia?) followed by <br />introgression with an alternate allele associated with another <br />taxon (possibly robusta) entering that basin, perhaps after the <br />integration of the lower Colorado and Gila basins (as has been <br />postulated by several workers, e.g., Minckley et al, 1986), <br />followed by diffusion into other portions of the Colorado <br />diminishing with distance from the source basin. An alternate <br />hypothesis, whereby the 112" allele was first present in the Gila <br />Basin followed by entry of the "ill allele from the east may not <br />supported, as the 11111 allele is not present in samples from <br />basins (e.g., Guzman) to the east (but see below). Again the <br />possibility of a novel allele, as opposed to a former marker, <br />arising through hybridizaton must be considered. <br />Intuitively, because of the high degree of morphological <br />similarity between the intermedia morphotype and forms in the <br />Guzman and Rio Grand basins to the east, as well as the genetic <br />similarity between Gila and Guzman basin samples (e.g., Fig. 13), <br />one might search among alleles in the Guzman sample for possible <br />markers for intermedia. However no alleles have distributions <br />(Figs. 2-12) which unambigously qualify as candidates. It is <br />also notable that niether of the candidate marker alleles for <br />intermedia discussed above are present in the small nigrescens <br />sample incorporated into this study. However, DeMarais (1992) <br />scored larger samples of nigrescens and pandora homozygous for a <br />slow allele at "PGM-A" which appears analagous to the slow allele <br />scored by him in Gila Basin samples and, by comparison, to the <br />111" allele discussed herein above. - <br />DeMarais (1992), DeMarais et al. (1992), and Dowling and <br />DeMarais (1993) pointed out, based on studies focused primarily <br />in the lower Colorado Basin, that fixed or nearly fixed allelic <br />differences occur between Lake Mohave bonytail (G. elegans) stock <br />and extant chub populations (robusta, intermedia, or other) in <br />the Gila Basin and Bill Williams systems at the CBP-1 and CK-A <br />loci. These findings are generally corroborated herein (Figs. <br />4,5), though such differences do not exist at these loci between <br />Lake Mohave bonytail stock and upper Colorado Basin samples <br />21
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.