Laserfiche WebLink
the Gila Basin and Bill Williams system have been regarded as <br />three taxa. The greatly attenuated bonytail chub, Gila elegans <br />Baird and Girard (1853), formerly occurred in larger streams, <br />such as the lower Gila River and mainstem Colorado, but has been <br />extirpated for decades except in Lake Mohave. The more <br />generalized roundtail chub, Gila robusta Baird and Girard (1853), <br />inhabited rivers and larger creeks of the region and, while <br />extirpated from much of its former range, fragments of what were <br />probably formerly more continuous populations remain in several <br />larger creeks of the Gila Basin and Bill Williams system. The <br />third species, the thick-bodied Gila chub, G. intermedia (Girard, <br />1856), typically inhabited smaller tributary habitats, including <br />springs, and, again, while many populations have been extirpated, <br />several persist at isolated localities. Samples from many <br />populations are clearly separable into these three entities on <br />shape and meristic characters (Rinne, 1976; DeMarais, 1986; <br />Douglas, herewith). However, some problematic populations, <br />showing various degrees of morphological intermediacy between <br />robusta and intermedia, have also been identified in streams in <br />the Gila Basin, mostly in tributaries to the Verde River and in <br />the upper Gila proper. Rinne (1976) applied the epithet grahami <br />Baird and Girard (1853) to these populations, treating them as a <br />subspecies of G. robusta. The extant populations of Gila forms <br />are broadly sympatric in the Gila Basin but are generally not <br />known to be syntopic (Rinse, 1976). Contacts between the various <br />forms may therefore be relatively rare. <br />Alternate hypotheses have been advanced as explanations for <br />the array of Gila forms occurring in the Gila Basin. Miller <br />(1946) theorized that intermedia and other forms (exclusive of <br />elegans) were "ecological subspecies" (i.e., genetically <br />determined) of G. robusta. Rinne (1976) hypothesized that <br />robusta, intermedia, and and the morphologically intermediate <br />"grahami'l constituted independant lineages with "grahamill closest <br />related to robusta. Smith et al. (1979) regarded these forms and <br />all others in the Colorado Basin (e.g., bonytail, humpback chubs) <br />as members of a single "superspecies" complex, a term applicable <br />to a group of closely related species (Mayr, 1969) and thus one <br />of questionable utility beyond species complex or even genus, and <br />one which might equate to several definitions of "species flock" <br />posed in papers compended in Echelle and Kornfield (1984). <br />DeMarais (1986), based on morphological and geological evidence, <br />held that robusta and intermedia constituted distinct lineages <br />but that phenotypically intermediate populations had arisen <br />through multiple hybridization events. These occurred when those <br />taxes were brought into occasional contact by various events in <br />the Pliocene which integrated formerly separate basins into the <br />present configuration of the lower Colorado and Gila basins. <br />DeMarais (1992) again advanced this scenario as the most viable <br />hypothesis based on studies of allozyme variation. One <br />hypothesis that has not been advanced to date is that the robusta <br />form of Gila may be of hybrid origin between an intermedia- <br />18