My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7017
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:33:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7017
Author
Starnes, W. C.
Title
Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
1989.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
spp. was established because knowledge of variation of <br />numerous loci (45) in this species was gained in the study. <br />1989. Moretti, M., S. Cranney and B. Roberts. Distribution and <br />abundance of Gila spp. in Desolation and Gray canyons of the <br />Green River during 1985 and 1986. Utah Div. Wildlf. Res. <br />Rpt., Salt Lake City. 29 p. <br />Reports a study in which numerous Gila spp. were collected <br />in the Green River in Desolation and Gray canyons with <br />morphometric and meristic data taken and photographs for <br />later analysis by digitizer and computer. Fin tissue and <br />dead specimens were frozen for eletrophoretic analysis. <br />Morphometric and eletrophoretic analyses of this material <br />were performed by M.J. Rosenfeld (see below). In this <br />population, based on chromosomal analysis, "reproductive <br />isolation" was indicated between G. cypha and G. robusta; <br />the degree of isolation between G. cypha and G. elegans (if <br />present?) could not be determined. However this same <br />conclusion cannot be inferred from Rosenfeld and Wilkinson <br />(1989)(next) who stated that these taxa were <br />electrophoretically indistinguishable. Morphological <br />analysis indicated considerable variation among localities <br />within the canyon area, ranging from pure humpbacks to <br />"humpback intergrades" similar to some specimens encountered <br />from Black Rocks on the Colorado River. However, it was <br />felt that hybridization was rare or non-existent (but see <br />conflicting opinions below). <br />1989. Rosenfeld, M.J., and J.A. Wilkinson. Biochemical genetics <br />of the Colorado River Gila complex (Pisces: Cyprinidae). <br />Southwest. Nat. 34:232-244. <br />Presents results of a study performed on Gila specimens from <br />` scattered localities in the Colorado basin, including <br />presumed cypha from Colorado and Green river canyon areas <br />and the Little Colorado River, robusta from the Colorado <br />River and the San Raphael system (Green R. trib.), elegans <br />obtained from the hatchery stock derived from Lake Mohave <br />population, G. robusta seminuda from the Virgin River, and <br />known hybrids from hatchery stock. Fixed differences at <br />loci were not found but allelic variation was present, <br />though not necessarily in concordence with morphotypes. <br />Intra- and interspecific allelic variation was present. G. <br />cypha and G. robusta from the upper basin are <br />indistinguishable while differences exist between upper <br />basin and Little Colorado humpback samples. While <br />heterozygosity may have remained high in elegans (e.g., <br />Minckley et al, 1989, above)(but no historic estimate of <br />this is available?), this attribute may have declined in <br />recent years in cypha and extensive hybridization with <br />robusta is inferred in upper basin populations. This is in <br />contrast to statements made in Moretti et al. above based on <br />21
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.