Laserfiche WebLink
1982. Kaeding, L.R., and M.A. Zimmerman. Life history and <br />population ecology of the humpback chub in the Little <br />Colorado and Colorado rivers of the Grand Canyon, Arizona; <br />pp. 281-320, in: W.H. Miller et al., Pt. 2. U.S. Fish & <br />Wildlf. Serv.-Bur. Reclam., Salt Lake City. 365 p. <br />A treatment primarily of life history and ecology attributes <br />of G. cypha but gives a summary of meristic variation from <br />large samples taken in the Little Colorado and adjacent area <br />noting differences between chubs taken near the mouth of the <br />LCR and those from a few km upstream. Suggests that the <br />high incidence of high meristic counts in specimens from the <br />lower reaches reflects a residual genetic influence of G. <br />elegans which purportedly once occurred in the region. Some <br />reproductive isolation between downstream and upstream <br />populations was suggested as was the need for further study <br />through electrophoretic or other techniques. <br />1982. Tyus, H.M., C.W. McAda, B.D. Burdick. Green. River fishery <br />investigations: 1979-1981; pp. 1-99 in: W.H. Miller et al., <br />eds. Colorado River Fishery Project. Pt. 2. U.S. Fish & <br />Wldlf. Serv.-Bur. Reclam., Salt L. City, UT. 365 p. <br />In the course of an extensive field study designed to determine <br />habitat preferences and movements of Gila species in a <br />section of the Green River numerous specimens were collected <br />and subjected to analyses suggested by Smith et al. (1979) <br />as being possibly definitive for three species. <br />Difficulities in application of these criteria were <br />encountered because of the use of live specimens, lack of <br />differentiation in juvenile specimens, variation in <br />technique between workers, and possible differences in form <br />of live versus preserved material and it was suggested that <br />refinement of the technique was needed. A centimeter grid <br />board technique was used to capture shape dimensions of live <br />fishes, a method which, in conjunction with photographs, has <br />since been used extensively in upper Colorado River basin <br />studies. In a.preserved sample, over half could not be <br />classified as belonging to a particular taxon and the plight <br />of attempted field identifiers of such material was pointed <br />out. Meristic data (gill rakers, vertebral counts) is <br />presented for samples containing three species. Fin tissue <br />was reportedly sent to Arizona State University (now at <br />UCLA??) for eletrophoretic analysis. <br />1982. Valdez, R.A., and G.H. Clemmer. Life history and <br />prospects for recovery of the humpback and bonytail chub; <br />pp. 109-119, in: W.H. Miller et al., Fishes of the upper <br />Colorado River system, present and future. Western Div. <br />Amer. Fish. Soc., Bethesda, Md. 131 p. <br />14