My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7017
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:33:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7017
Author
Starnes, W. C.
Title
Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
1989.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
introgressed populations derived from robusta and <br />intermedia. Concludes that lower basin chubs demonstrate a <br />lack of ecotypy and show no patterns consistent with <br />interspecific "intergradation" but subspecific <br />intergradation was apparent between subspecies grahami and <br />robusta. Discusses probable closest relationships of <br />intermedia with chub species to the south in the Mexican <br />Plateau region as opposed to robusta. <br />1977. Ecology Consultants, Inc. An indexed, annotated <br />bibliography of the endangered and threatened fishes of the <br />upper Colorado River system. U.S. Fish & Wildlf. Serv. <br />FWS/OBS-77/61. 169 p. <br />Provides annotated references, including taxonomic, to many <br />works published prior to 1977 but has a decidely upper basin <br />focus as the title suggests. A valuable guide to works not <br />published in the primary literature. <br />1977. Joseph, T.W., J.A. Sinning, R.J. Behnke, and P.B. Holden. <br />An evaluation of the status, life history, and habitat <br />requirements of endangered and threatened fishes of the <br />upper Colorado River system. U.S. Fish & Wildlf. Serv. <br />FWS/OBS-77/62. 184 p. <br />Contains a thorough discussion of the Gila complex" in light <br />of "modern" species concepts, but basically subscribing to a <br />biological or "genetic" species concept (now no longer <br />considered modern), and pointing out the importance of <br />knowing what taxa are involved when managing endangered <br />species. Reiterates the view of Holden and Stahnaker (1970) <br />that the real problems lie with determinations of the <br />taxonomic status of G. cyoha versus G. elegans with the <br />distinctness of elegans from robusta being non- <br />problematical. Regards cypha and elegans as "valid" species <br />and poses the question as to whether these forms may be <br />hybridizing extensively in some areas and maintaining <br />integrity in others, but also raises the question, based on <br />morphologically intermediate "intergrades", if cypha should <br />be considered a subspecies of elegans. Points out the need <br />for extensive studies of hybridization among the species. <br />Also briefly recapitulates the taxonomic history of each <br />taxon. <br />1977. Suttkus, R.D., and G.H. Clemmer. The humpback chub, Gila <br />cypha, in the Grand Canyon area of the Colorado River. Occ. <br />Pap. Tulane Univ. Mus. Nat. Hist. 1. 30 p. <br />Contains an extremely detailed description and analysis of <br />variation of G. cypha at growth stages ranging from small <br />juveniles to adults based on Grand Canyon area specimens and <br />compares these with a small number of supposed juveniles of <br />11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.