My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7746
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7746
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:33:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7746
Author
Stanford, J. A. and J. V. Ward.
Title
Management of Aquatic Resources in Large Catchments
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
Recognizing Interactions Between Ecosystem Connectivity and Environmental Disturbance.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
not regulated by on-channel lakes, apparently in response to temperature criteria <br />(Stanford, unpublished). <br />These observations emphasize that the riverine ecosystems are truly four <br />dimensional, with longitudinal (upstream-downstream), lateral (floodplain-uplands), <br />and vertical (hyporheic-phreatic) dimensions (Figure 1); since these spatial dimensions <br />are transient or dynamic over time as a consequence of relativity, temporality is the <br />forth dimension (Ward 1989). Within a given stream reach, distribution and abundance <br />of organisms is a multivariate function of the structural and functional attributes of <br />channel (fluvial), riparian (floodplain,shoreline) and hyporheic (groundwater) habitats <br />as they interact within time and space with the geomorphology and hydrology of the <br />catchment. Clearly, catchments may be characterized as patch-dynamic systems <br />(Pringle et al. 1988, Townsend 1989) and ecological connectivity of patches is a <br />fundamental feature. <br />Many riverine organisms may traverse all three spatial dimensions in the <br />process of completing life cycles (high connectivity), whereas others may be relatively <br />stationary (low connectivity). For example, in the Flathead River, Montana, a gravel <br />bottom system with expansive intermontane floodplains characterized by substantial <br />interstitial flow (Figure 2), certain specialized stoneflies (Insecta: Plecoptera) reside <br />within floodplain groundwaters during the entire larval stage. Indeed, hundreds of <br />these crepuscular stoneflies have been collected in single samples taken from <br />groundwater monitoring wells 2-3 km from the river channel, demonstrating the <br />enormous volume of the hyporheic zone in this river. They are the top consumers in a <br />speciose (80+ species) groundwater food web. Yet, these stoneflies emerge as <br />winged adults from the river channel and fly into the riparian vegetation to mate and <br />produce eggs. The eggs are deposited in the river channel, followed by larval <br />immigration into the hyporheic zone (Stanford and Ward 1988). Many other riverine <br />insects, which commonly characterize the rhithron (cold, swift-flowing, gravel-cobble <br />substratum) habitat of western USA rivers also depend upon riparian vegetation during <br />the flight period, but the larval stage is completed within the channel. Most non-insect <br />zoobenthos and periphyton (attached algae) are essentially obligate channel <br />inhabitants, although they, like most fish species and insect larvae, are often distinctly <br />segregated by temperature, flow, substratum or behavioral criteria within the altitudinal <br />gradient of the stream continuum (e.g., bull charr distribution in Figure 3, see also Resh <br />and Rosenberg 1984, Matthews and Heins 1987). <br />Biodiveristy and bioproduction in rivers are related to a plethora of factors that <br />interact bioenergetically (Figure 4) to determine reproductive success of individulas <br />7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.