Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Abstract <br />We argue that management within catchment basins must be approached with <br />an empirically-based understanding of the natural connectivity and variability of <br />structural and functional properties of riverine ecosystems. Rivers are four dimensional <br />environments involving processes that connect upstream-downstream, channel- <br />hyporheic (groundwater) and channel-floodplain (riparian) zones or patches and these <br />differ temporally. Natural and human disturbances, including biotic feedbacks (such as <br />predation, parasitism and other food web dynamics), interact to determine the most <br />probable biophysical state of the catchment ecosystem. Human disturbances can be <br />quantitatively determined by deviations from an observed biophysical state (baseline), <br />but usually this requires long-term ecological data sets. A case history of the Flathead <br />River-Lake system in Montana (USA) and British Columbia (Canada) is summarized to <br />illustrate how disturbances interact at the catchment level of organization. Owing to the <br />natural complexities of catchment ecosystems and the cumulative effects of human <br />disturbances, rationale and logistics of obtaining long term data often seem intractable <br />and excessively expensive. The naive alternative is to derive and implement cook <br />book procedures that are agency specific and often result in management actions that <br />interfere with each other. We argue that integrated management at the catchment level <br />is needed and propose some simple principles that begin with broader based <br />collegiate training for prospective managers. <br />Key words: ecosystem, river, catchment, drainage basin, management, disturbance, <br />natural resources, watershed, Flathead River, Montana <br />2