Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />predictable, depending on climate, reservoir morphometry, the type <br />of discharge release, and the distance the releases travel <br />downstream. <br /> <br />Coal mlnlng. Overburden on coal deposits in the west are <br />typically low in pyritic minerals and rich in shale and <br />carbonates. These carbonates buffer surface waters and streams <br />that flow through coal mines on the Colorado Plateau may not <br />suffer the dramatic reduction in pH observed in eastern streams <br />(Canton and Ward 19B1). <br /> <br />Uranium mining. Because anthropo~enic groundwater pollution <br />exerts long-term effects on water qual,ty, pollution has become a <br />regional concern, particularly where uranium mining is taking <br />place. The Rio Puerco originates in the Chuska and Zuni Mountains <br />in northeastern Arizona and drains a significant portion of the <br />Navajo Indian Reservation, as well as Petrified Forest National <br />Monument before entering the Little Colorado River. Originally an <br />ephemeral stream, the Rio Puerco began receiving perennial <br />effluent from uranium mines in the 1950's. The groundwater <br />quality of the Rio Puerco in the Little Colorado River drainage is <br />generally high in total dissolved solids (ca. 700 mg/L), and is <br />characterized by high alkalinity, sodium, sulfate, iron, manganese <br />and strontium. In July, 1979, a tailings-pond dam at United <br />Nuclear Corporation's Church Rock Mill failed, pouring 3.6 x 108 L <br />(94 million gallons) of radioactive effluent into the Rio Puerco. <br />Although just one of numerous water quality violations in the Rio <br />Puerco drainage in recent years, the Church Rock spill was the <br />largest radioactive contamination accident in the United States' <br />history. However, 2 years after the spill, well water quality <br />analyses in the vicinity of the spill conducted by the U.S. <br />Geological Survey failed to show increased groundwater <br />radioactivity (Webb et al. 19B7b). Movement of contaminants into <br />the local aquifers is undoubtedly slow (Webb et al. 19B7b). <br /> <br />Bacteriology. Water quality, including bacteriology, was <br />examined in the Grand Canyon reach from 197B to 19BO (Tunnicliff <br />and Brickler 19B1). They found that the water leaving Glen Canyon <br />Dam was stable in quality and relatively free of enteric <br />contaminants. Although hypolimnetic release kept the water below <br />180e through the warmest summer months and retarded bacterial <br />growth, various natural and anthropogenic sources of bacterial <br />contamination occurred with increasing distance downstream. They <br />found elevated concentrations of bacteria particularly in fine <br />sediments which were subject to re-entrainment in the water column <br />by discharge fluctuation, wave action and recreational activities. <br />Drinking water quality standards for total coliforms were often <br />exceeded in the mainstream, with up to 13,000 FC/100 ml entering <br />from flooding tributaries, such as the Paria and Little Colorado <br />rivers. Bacterial content in benthic mud at numerous tributary <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br />. <br />