My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9383
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9383
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:59:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9383
Author
SWCA, I.
Title
Recovery Goals for the four Colorado River Endangered Fish Species.
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
Logan.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />depletions, continues to support one of the highest proportions of native flannelmouth suckers <br />mus latipinnis) and bluehead suckers (c. discobolus) of any river in the basin (Holden <br />espite the presence of 13 species of nonnative fishes, reproducing and self-sustaining <br />populations of native species persist, except for Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker. <br />The San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program (SJRIP) is a similar <br />program to the UCRRP and was established in 1991, to conserve populations of Colorado <br />pikeminnow and razorback sucker in the San Juan River Basin, while proceeding with water <br />development in co . ce with federal and state laws, interstate compacts, decrees, and federal <br />trust responsibilitie <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />3.0 THREATS TO THE SPECIES <br /> <br />Threats to the four endangered fishes were not fully known and understood at the time <br />that the species were listed. The principal perceived threats when Colorado pikeminnow and <br />humpback chub were designated as "end gered" in 1967 were dams and nonnative fishes. <br />When the bonytail and the razorback su were listed in 1980 and 1991, the threats were better <br />understood, but the manner in which s were affecting the fish was poorly understood, <br />and actions to minimize or remove those threats were just being developed. Primary threats to <br />the four endangered fish species of the Colorado River Basin include streamflow depletion and <br />regulation, physical and chemical habitat modifications, hybridization, and nonnative fish <br />species. These threat categories fall within the five listing factors (see Section 1.3), as described <br />in the following sections. Site-specific management actions .. mize or remove these threats <br />are provided in section 5.0. <br />3.1 The Present or Threatened Destruction, Modification, or Curtailment <br />of Its Habitat or Range <br />3.1.1 Streamflow Modification <br />Maintenance of streamflow is important to the ecological integrity of large western rivers <br />(Collier et at. 1996, Poffet at. 1997, Schmidt et al' 1998). Life histories of many <br />including fish, are often specifically timed to flow magnitude and timing, and disrupti <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.