Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />higher than in wild fish. If wild age-O Colorado squawfish <br />depleted their lipid reserves at the same rate as my starved <br />hatchery-reared fish, the majority of the wild fish would <br />exhaust their energy stores and perish overwinter. However, <br />unlike my laboratory fish, the lipid content of wild age-O <br />Colorado squawfish did not decline significantly overwinter. <br />The failure to detect any significant difference between <br />fall and spring lipid levels among wild fish may be due to <br />three factors. First, if overwinter mortality occurred in <br />the Colorado River in the stretch we sampled, my spring <br />lipid values would be biased high since only surviving fish <br />(which would have had higher lipid content than non-survivors) <br />were analyzed. Another possible explanation is that my fall <br />sample was collected before water temperatures had fallen <br />below the 130 C growth threshold. Fish may have been able <br />to accumulate additional lipid reserves between the time of <br />my collection on 1 October 1988, when backwater temperatures <br />ranged from 12.2 to 25.00 C (mean = 16.90 C), and the <br />beginning of winter (when water temperatures fell below 130 <br />C in late october). Finally, age-O Colorado squawfish in <br />the lower Colorado River may maintain their lipid reserves <br />overwinter by feeding. My laboratory observations of active <br />swimming and feeding behavior exhibited by age-O Colorado <br />squawfish demonstrate that they will feed at winter <br />temperatures if food is available. Stomach analyses <br />conducted by the Larval Fish Laboratory at Colorado state <br />