Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the well-being of many aquatic organisms, particularly fishes. This <br />substantiates the conclusion that this is the area of most severe <br />degradation or that 10% is a minimum short-term survival flOw at best. <br />Flows from 30% to 100% of average result in a gain of 40% for wetted <br />substrate, average depth increases from l~ to 2 feet, and average <br />velocities rise from l~ to 2 feet per second. These are within good <br />to optimum ranges for aquatic organisms, however, it requires 3 to 10 <br />times the amount of water needed for a short-term minimum or good base <br />fl~, and gains or benefit-cost ratios may become questionable. In- <br />creasing flow from 100% of average to 200% of average (doubled) only <br />increases average wetted substrate by 10%, average depth increases <br />from 2 to 3 feet, and average velocity rises from 2 to3~ feet per <br />second. Velocities averaging 3~ feet per second are probably too <br />high for the general w~ll-being of most aquatic organisms but good <br />for moving sediment, bedload, and white water boating. In all 11 <br />field tests of the Montana Method, water depth appeared adequate for <br />aquatic organisms whenever velocities were satisfactory. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Analyses of hundreds of additional flow regimens near U.S.G.S. gages <br />in 21 different states during the past 17 years substantiate these <br />correlations between similar flows on a wide variety of streams. <br />Running waters studied ranged from small precipitous brooks high <br />in the Rocky Mountains, to large, low-gradient rivers out on the <br />prairies of mid-America and streams along the coastal plains. This <br />phenomenon of nature is documented with hundreds of black and white <br />photographs and 35 rom. slides that are registered and filed with the <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) in Billings, Montana; Grand <br />Island, Nebraska; and Denver, Colorado. <br /> <br />9 <br />