My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7912
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7912
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:58:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7912
Author
Tennant, D. L.
Title
Instream Flow Regimens for Fish, Wildlife, Recreation and Related Environmental Resources.
USFW Year
1975.
USFW - Doc Type
Billings, MT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Reconunend the most appropriate and reasonable flow(s) that can be <br />justified to provide protection and habitat for all aquatic resources. <br /> <br />RESULTS <br /> <br />Detailed field studies were conducted on 11 streams in 3 states <br />between 1964 and 1974 testing the Montana Method (Table 2). This <br />work involved physical, ch~mical, and biological analyses of 38 <br />different flows at 58 cross-sections on 196 stream miles, affecting <br />both coldwater and warmwater fisheries. Reports or publications on <br />6 study streams are available as indicated in Table 2. Numerous <br />black and white photos and 35 nun. slides were taken of all the flow <br />stages studied at each cross-section. The studies were all planned, <br />conducted, and analyzed with the help of state fisheries biologists. <br />These studies reveal that the condition of the aquatic habitat is <br />remarkably similar on most streams carrying the same portion of the <br />average flow. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Width, depth, and velocity are physical instream flow parameters <br />vital to the well-being of aquatic organisms and their habitat. <br />Sixteen-hundred measurements of these parameters for 48 different <br />flows on 10 of the streams cited in Table 2 show that they all increase <br />with flow and that changes are much greater at the lower levels of flow <br />(fig.l). Width, depth, and velocity all changed more rapidly from no <br />flow to a flow of 10% of the average, than at any point thereafter. <br />Ten percent (10%) of the average flow covered 60% of the substrates, <br />depths averaged 1 foot, and velocities averaged 3/4 foot per second. <br />Studies show that these are critical points or the lower limits for <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.