My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7921
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7921
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:57:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7921
Author
Trembly, T. L. and G. A. Gould.
Title
Opportunities To Protect Instream Flows In Colorado And Wyoming.
USFW Year
1987.
USFW - Doc Type
Biological Report 87(10),
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Adjudication of Water Rights Under the 1969 Act <br /> <br />In Colorado, the control on the use and distribution of water is carried <br />out through two offices--a water court and the State Engineer. The water <br />court adjudicates the water right and may call upon the judgement of an expert <br />referee to aid in the decision. No State permit is required to appropriate <br />water in Colorado; adjudication by the water court and subsequent decree takes <br />the place of a permit. <br /> <br />The first step in the process is to file an application with the clerk of <br />the proper water court, that is, the court governing the geographic district <br />in which the right is sought. Opposing statements are also filed with the <br />water clerk. The State and Division Engineers are sent copies of applications <br />and oppositions. <br /> <br />No later than the end of the month in which the application is submitted, <br />the water clerk must publish a resume of applications in a general circulation <br />newspaper. The water court may also require radio and television broadcasts. <br />Additionally, a copy of the resume must be sent to any person who would be <br />affected by the ruling. <br /> <br />The referee must make a ruling within 60 days of the filing of the last <br />notices of opposition. The application may be approved, disapproved in whole <br />or in part, or referred to the water court. The water court selects a hearing <br />date for cases referred by the referee. The court also hears cases where the <br />referee's ruling has been protested. <br /> <br />The water court will confirm, modify, reverse, or reverse and remand the <br />ruling of the referee in cases where the ruling has been protested. In cases <br />where there has been no protest, the court may confirm and approve the applica- <br />tion. In cases where there is no protest, no appellate review will be allowed, <br />but applications that have been protested may be subject to appellate review. <br /> <br />An overview of the water rights adjudication framework in Colorado is <br />provided in Figure 1. <br /> <br />STATE APPROPRIATION OF INSTREAM FLOWS <br /> <br />Opportun ity <br /> <br />In 1973, the Colorado Legislature passed, for the first time, a statute <br />that directly provides for authority of the Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />(CWCB) to appropriate streamflows for preservation of the "natural environment <br />to a reasonable degree" (CRS ~ 37-92-102). Colorado's minimum stream flow <br />legislation is frequently called "Senate Bill 97" (1973 Colo. Sess. Laws Ch. <br />442). <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />Under S.B. 97, the CWCB has made significant progress in appropriating <br />water to remain instream. The following detailed discussion is, in essence, a <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.