My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9593
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9593
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:56:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9593
Author
Tetra Tech Inc.
Title
Concept Development Report Hartland Diversion Dam Fish Passage Structure Delta, Colorado.
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />As part of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program, fish passage <br />is proposed at the Hartland diversion dam to provide fish access to historic habitat further <br />upstream on the Gunnison River. The target species for this projeCt include the Colorado <br />pikeminnow and the razorback sucker. Selective passage for the screening of non-native <br />predators is not considered necessary at the Hartland Diversion Dam since selective passage is <br />provided on the Gunnison River at the Redlands fish passageway downstream at Grand <br />Junction, Colorado. <br />Three alternatives are developed and presented in this report. These alternatives <br />include a concrete fish ladder on the east bank, an open channel boulder drop-pool fish ladder <br />on the east bank and the reconstruction of the dam for fish and boater passage in an open <br />channel drop-pool sequence through the center of the river. <br />Both Alternatives I and II (concrete or boulder drop-pool on east bank) accomplish the <br />goal of providing fish passage and both alternatives are relatively inexpensive. However, the <br />City of Delta has expressed an interest in the third alternative, which provides fish passage and <br />accommodates boater passage. Alternative III is more expensive than either Alternative I and II <br />since it requires regrading 250 feet of river, installation of concrete cutoff walls and over 20,000 <br />tons of boulders. The primary advantage of Alternative III is that it opens this reach of the <br />Gunnison River to boater passage, which is currently not possible due to the height of the <br />Hartland dam. Hartland Irrigation Company was not opposed to Alternative III. <br />The three alternatives are evaluated for a range of hydraulic conditions ranging from low <br />flows of 350 cfs up to and including the 100-year flood of 21,200 cfs. Bank overtopping for <br />existing conditions and all three alternatives occurs when flows .exceed 11,600 cfs, the 5-year <br />event. For events that exceed 11,600 cfs the dam becomes submerged and the difference in <br />water surface elevations upstream and downstream of the dam become small enough that fish <br /> <br />E-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.