Laserfiche WebLink
<br />of the fish passage structures, under low flow conditions of 350 cfs, is to lower the water <br /> <br />surface elevation by .07 feet for Alternatives I and II and .05 feet for Alternative III. The net <br /> <br />effect of the fish passage structures on water surface elevations, for flows above 350 cfs, <br /> <br />decrease as flows increase for Alternatives I and II. The net effect of the fish and boat passage <br /> <br />on water surface elevations for Alternative III increase as flows increase above 350 cfs. <br /> <br />However the water surface elevations for Alternatives III all remain well above the minimum <br /> <br />operating levels. <br /> <br />7.2 Fish Passageway Operations and Swimming Ability <br /> <br /> <br />All three alternatives are developed using the same criteria for fish swimming ability. <br />For flows that are less than 11,600 cfs, velocities and depths for Alternatives I and II are in the <br />acceptable range. The fish ladders in Alternatives I and II become inundated when river flows <br />exceed 11,600 cfs, at which time fish passage may be possible directly over the dam along the <br />riverbanks. <br />Flow characteristics for Alternative III vary not only as a function of river flows but also <br />as a function of location in the passageway. When the Gunnison River is at 350 cfs, depths <br />range from 1.7 to 4.5 feet and velocities vary from 4.6 to 0.4 fps in the chutes and pools, <br />respectively. As flows increase so do depths and velocities. At 1200 cfs, depths range from <br />2.6 to 5.5 feet and velocities range from 4.8 to 1.1 fps in the chutes and pools, respectively. <br />Above 1200 cfs velocities in the center of the river start to exceed the limits established for fish <br />passage at which time it is anticipated that the fish are able to pass over the structure along the <br />riverbanks. Thus during the critical pre-runoff spawning period in late April, modeled at 3000 <br />cfs, the river banks are accessible for fish passage. <br />Alternative III design is very similar to the water diversion/fish passageway structure <br />built on the Yampa River for the City of Craig. Flow characteristics and river dimensions of the <br />Yampa River are very similar to the Gunnison River at the Hartland diversion structure. <br /> <br />35 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />