Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TABLE 4.4 DESCRIPTIONS OF DESIGN FLOW. GUNNISON:RIVERAT HARTLAND DIVERSION DAM <br /> <br />Flow Description <br />210 cfs Lowest flow in period of record. <br />350 cfs 90% exceedence of low flow in August. Lowest flow analyzed for ladder design <br />650 cfs Average low flow used to establish ladder inverts. <br />1 ,200 cfs Average flows in August <br />3,000 cfs Average flows last week of April (anticipated pre-runoff migration period) <br />3,460 cfs 1.25-year flood event <br />6,470 cfs 2-year flood event <br />11,600 cfs 5-year flood event <br />13,500 cfs 10-year flood event (FIS) <br />18,700 cfs 50-year flood event (FIS) <br />21,200 cfs Regulatory 1 OO-year flood event (FIS) <br /> <br />HIC reports that they typically spill approximately 10 cfs (HIC 2000) at the spill channel, <br />which indicates that the amount of water diverted out of the Gunnison River at the headgates is <br />50 to 70 cfs. To provide sufficient depth and velocities for the fish in the by-pass channel, an <br />additional 10 cfs is added to the spilled amount of flow. This requires an additional 10 cfs at <br />the headgate to the ditch. Thus the screen is designed for 40 to 60 cfs with 20 cfs being <br />diverted into the spill/by-pass channel. <br /> <br />v. HYDRAULICS <br />To develop design parameters and evaluate the impacts of a fish passage structure on <br />the hydraulic conditions at the Hartland diversion, a hydraulic model was developed using the <br />Army Corp of Engineers HEC-RAS program, version 2.2 (USACE 1997). A total of 19 river <br />cross sections were surveyed upstream and downstream of the diversion structure by <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />