My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9593
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9593
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:56:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9593
Author
Tetra Tech Inc.
Title
Concept Development Report Hartland Diversion Dam Fish Passage Structure Delta, Colorado.
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />III. FISH PASSAGE CRITERIA <br />The target species for fish ladder design at the Hartland diversion dam are the Colorado <br />pikeminnow and the razorback sucker (Burdick 1996). Three primary types of information <br />pertinent to the design of the fish passage structure include the timing of migration patterns, <br />swimming ability and behavior. In terms of swimming ability, standards for the fish ladder have <br />been based on the swimming abilities of the razorback sucker, as the sucker is believed to be a <br />weaker swimmer than the Colorado pikeminnow (Mefford 2000; Pfeifer 2000). The fish <br />passage is designed and constructed to allow for non-selective passage (i.e. no trapping <br />facilities). <br />3.1 Migration <br />Both the Colorado pikeminnow and the razorback sucker undertake riverine migrations <br />for feeding and spawning during different periods of the year. Various studies on the <br />reproductive ecology of these two species suggest that the Colorado pikeminnow tend to make <br />more extensive and longer migrations to spawning areas than the razorback sucker (Burdick <br />2000c). Based on studies in the Upper Colorado River Basin both species migrate upstream <br />and downstream to reach spawning sites (Tyus and McAda 1984; Tyus et al. 1987; Tyus 1990; <br />McAda and Kaeding 1991; Irving and Modde 2000). Mature razorback sucker spawn on the <br />ascending limb of the hydrograph, whereas Colorado pikeminnow begin migrating to spawning <br />areas as peak runoff subsides and water temperatures are increasing (Tyus 1990, 1991: <br />McAda and Kaeding 1991). Following spawning, both species may make return migrations to <br />former areas to rest and feed (Wick 2000). <br />In addition, data collected from fish capture in the fish trap at the Redlands facility on <br />the Gunnison River in Grand Junction, Colorado, indicate that a significant number of sub-adult <br />and adult Colorado pikeminnow move up through the fish ladder during July and August <br />(Burdick 2000c). This movement is associated with the post-spawning period for this species <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.