Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the utilization curve, resulting in preference curve coefficients. Theoret- <br />ically, category three curves should be unconditionally transferable to any <br />stream, although this has not been validated. At present, very few category <br />three curves exist because most habitat utilization data sets are without <br />concomitant habitat availability data sets. In the future, the need to collect <br />habitat availability data will be impressed upon investigators. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Category four curves (conditional preference curves), describe habitat <br />requirements as a function of interaction among variables. For example, fish <br />depth utilization may depend on the presence or absence of cover; or velocity <br />utilization may depend on time of day or season of year. Category four curves <br />are just beginning to be developed by IFASG. <br /> <br />HSI models generally utilize category one curves for habitat evaluation. <br />IFIM analyses may utilize any or all categories of curves, but category three <br />and four curves yield the most precise results in IFIM applications; and <br />category two curves wi 11 yield accurate results if they are found to be <br />transferable to the stream segment under investigation. If category two <br />curves are not felt to be transferable for a particular application, then <br />category one curves may be a better choice. <br /> <br />For an IFIM analysis of riverine habitat, an investigator may wish to <br />utilize the curves available in this publication; modify the curves based on <br />new or additional information; or collect field data to generate new curves. <br />For example, if an investigator has information that spawning habitat utiliza- <br />tion in his study stream is different from that represented by the SI curves, <br />he may want to modify the existing SI curves or collect data to generate new ~ <br />curves. Once the curves to be used are dec i ded upon, then the curve co- .., <br />ordinates are used to build a computer file (FISHFIL) which becomes a necessary <br />component of PHABSIM analyses (Milhous et al. 1981). <br /> <br />Availability of Graphs for Use in IFIM <br /> <br />All curves available for IFIM analysis of white sucker habitat are <br />category one (Table 7). Investigators are asked to review the curves (Figs. 4 <br />to 8) and modify them, if necessary, before using them. <br /> <br />Spawning. For IFIM analyses of white sucker spawning habitat, use curves <br />for the time period during which spawning occurs (sometime between March and <br />July, depending on locale). Spawning curves are broad and, if more accuracy <br />is desired, investigators are encouraged to develop their own curves which <br />will specifically reflect habitat utilization at the selected site. <br /> <br />There are two approaches for determining the amount of spawning/egg <br />incubation habitat for a given stream reach. The recommended approach for the <br />white sucker is to treat spawning and egg incubation as separate life stages, <br />each with its own set of criteria (Figs. 4 and 5). If the spawning/egg incuba- <br />tion weighted useable area varies by more than 10% during the 5 to 14 day egg <br />incubation period, then investigators may wish to determine the effective <br />spawning habitat, using methods outlined by Milhous (1982). <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />e <br />