My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7229
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7229
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:56:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7229
Author
Kaeding, L. R. and M. A. Zimmerman
Title
Life History and Ecology of the Humpback Chub in the Little Colorado and Colorado Rivers of the Grand Canyon
USFW Year
1983
USFW - Doc Type
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />the utilization curve, resulting in preference curve coefficients. Theoret- <br />ically, category three curves should be unconditionally transferable to any <br />stream, although this has not been validated. At present, very few category <br />three curves exist because most habitat utilization data sets are without <br />concomitant habitat availability data sets. In the future, the need to collect <br />habitat availability data will be impressed upon investigators. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Category four curves (conditional preference curves), describe habitat <br />requirements as a function of interaction among variables. For example, fish <br />depth utilization may depend on the presence or absence of cover; or velocity <br />utilization may depend on time of day or season of year. Category four curves <br />are just beginning to be developed by IFASG. <br /> <br />HSI models generally utilize category one curves for habitat evaluation. <br />IFIM analyses may utilize any or all categories of curves, but category three <br />and four curves yield the most precise results in IFIM applications; and <br />category two curves wi 11 yield accurate results if they are found to be <br />transferable to the stream segment under investigation. If category two <br />curves are not felt to be transferable for a particular application, then <br />category one curves may be a better choice. <br /> <br />For an IFIM analysis of riverine habitat, an investigator may wish to <br />utilize the curves available in this publication; modify the curves based on <br />new or additional information; or collect field data to generate new curves. <br />For example, if an investigator has information that spawning habitat utiliza- <br />tion in his study stream is different from that represented by the SI curves, <br />he may want to modify the existing SI curves or collect data to generate new ~ <br />curves. Once the curves to be used are dec i ded upon, then the curve co- .., <br />ordinates are used to build a computer file (FISHFIL) which becomes a necessary <br />component of PHABSIM analyses (Milhous et al. 1981). <br /> <br />Availability of Graphs for Use in IFIM <br /> <br />All curves available for IFIM analysis of white sucker habitat are <br />category one (Table 7). Investigators are asked to review the curves (Figs. 4 <br />to 8) and modify them, if necessary, before using them. <br /> <br />Spawning. For IFIM analyses of white sucker spawning habitat, use curves <br />for the time period during which spawning occurs (sometime between March and <br />July, depending on locale). Spawning curves are broad and, if more accuracy <br />is desired, investigators are encouraged to develop their own curves which <br />will specifically reflect habitat utilization at the selected site. <br /> <br />There are two approaches for determining the amount of spawning/egg <br />incubation habitat for a given stream reach. The recommended approach for the <br />white sucker is to treat spawning and egg incubation as separate life stages, <br />each with its own set of criteria (Figs. 4 and 5). If the spawning/egg incuba- <br />tion weighted useable area varies by more than 10% during the 5 to 14 day egg <br />incubation period, then investigators may wish to determine the effective <br />spawning habitat, using methods outlined by Milhous (1982). <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.