Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 5. (concluded). <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Variable <br /> <br />Assumptions and source <br /> <br />VIJ <br /> <br />Pool depth is important as cover (Stewart 1926). Pool <br />depths at which white suckers are commonly found (60 tl' <br />90 cm) (Propst 1982b) are considered optimum. Very <br />shallow depths (< 25 cm) are considered poor and very <br />deep pools were assumed to contribute to a good to fair <br />habitat because white suckers are found at varying pool <br />depths in streams (Thompson and Hunt 1930; Propst <br />1982b). Deeper pool depths are usualJy not considered a <br />habitat detriment because the white sucker inhabits many <br />depths in lacustrine habitats (Reighard 1913). <br /> <br />VI4 <br /> <br />Shade is an indication of cover and streams with ~ 50% <br />shade are considered excellent. Thompson and Hunt (1930) <br />and Dence (1948) report that suckers are commonly found <br />in shaded portions of streams. Unshaded streams are <br />assumed to be poor to fair depending on other cover <br />available. <br /> <br />VIS <br /> <br />White suckers reach maximum abundance in low to moder- <br />ate gradients (Stewart 1926). Since Propst (1982b) <br />failed to find white suckers where there was no flow, <br />very low gradients (< .5 m/km) were considered poor. <br />Very high gradients (> 25 m/km) were also considered <br />poor because white suckers appeared to have trouble <br />maintaining equilibrium in turbulent waters (Symons <br />1976). Minckley (1963), Curry (1979), and Hocutt and <br />Stauffer (1975) reported on white suckers occupying <br />streams with gradients of 1.2 to 13 m/km, which are <br />considered excellent to fair, respectively, as the <br />gradient increases. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />VI6 <br /> <br />White suckers are common in pools with slow to moderate <br />velocities (< 40 cm/sec), but Minckley (1963), and <br />Symons (1976) most frequently found adult white suckers <br />at velocities of 10 to 19 cm/sec which were assumed <br />excellent. As mentioned in VIS' turbulent velocities <br /> <br />(Symons 1976) or zero velocities (Propst 1982b) are <br />considered poor. <br /> <br />VI7 <br /> <br />Suckers have been reported to successfully spawn after <br />migrating up to 6.4 km (Oence 1948). Spawning habitat <br />up to these distances, without known obstructions, are <br />considered excellent. It is assumed that longer <br />distances would be progressively less suitable. <br /> <br />34 <br /> <br />e <br />