My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7229
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7229
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:56:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7229
Author
Kaeding, L. R. and M. A. Zimmerman
Title
Life History and Ecology of the Humpback Chub in the Little Colorado and Colorado Rivers of the Grand Canyon
USFW Year
1983
USFW - Doc Type
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />abundance of white sucker is lower (Propst 1982a). This phenomenon could <br />occur when the high tolerance of white suckers allows them to survive periods <br />of stress that are lethal to other species, thus affecting the HSI and relative <br />abundance correlation. <br /> <br />In order to achieve a better correlation between HSl1s and white sucker <br />relative abundance in riverine habitats, an additional model (Model 5) was <br />developed. More importance was given to cover with the addition of variables <br />for stream cover, percent shade, and pool depth. The importance of pool <br />velocity was considered by adding pool velocity and gradient variables. These <br />variables were intended to better define adult white sucker habitat. This <br />model has not been field tested. Decisions on which, if any, model to use <br />should be made by the potential user and will depend on the userl s needs and <br />resources available. <br /> <br />The lacustrine model was tested by entering reasonable combinations of <br />habitat variable values into the model (Table 4) and examining the model <br />output. The HSl1s resulting from the model reflected assumed carrying capacity <br />trends in habitats with the same characteristics as the sample data sets. <br /> <br />Model Description <br /> <br />Because white suckers are opportunistic feeders, we did not consider food <br />to be important in determining white sucker habitat suitability. In unproduc- <br />t i ve 1 akes and streams food may i nfl uence abundance. However, measures of <br />lake and stream productivity for white suckers have not been quantified. We <br />assumed that habitat quality is determined primarily by cover, water quality, <br />and spawning habitat. These were used as model components. Component ratings <br />were derived from individual variable suitability indices (Figs. 1 and 2). <br />Reasons for placing individual variables in specific components and assumed <br />variable interactions are described below. <br /> <br />Model Description - Riverine <br /> <br />Water quality component. The water quality component consists of turbid- <br />ity (V1), pH (V2), dissolved oxygen (V3), and temperature (V4). These vari- <br /> <br />ables affect growth, survival, and/or distribution of white suckers. Sub- <br />optimum levels of these variables, as defined by the suitability index graphs, <br />result in negative effects on individuals. Toxic substances are not considered <br />in th is mode 1 . <br /> <br />Reproduction. Temperature during spawning (V,) is included in the repro- <br /> <br />duction component because it is believed to be a primary factor influencing <br />initiation of spawning migration. Discharge may also be important, but would <br />be variable depending on the size of a river or stream. Also, less suitable <br />discharge levels can likely be compensated for by selection of more favorable <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.