Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Squawfish Population Viability Analysis --July 1993 <br /> <br />Page 27 <br /> <br />1.0 <br /> <br />0.1 <br />0.07 <br /> <br /> <br />p(1) <br /> <br />0.01 <br />.001 .01 .1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 0 <br /> <br />Nm <br /> <br />Figure A.I Relationship between proportion of private alleles and number of <br />immigrants per generation, assuming an island model of migration. From Slatkin <br />(1985). <br /> <br />In order to obtain an accurate estimate of Nm one needs to have at least 3 to 5 <br />separate populations containing approximately equal, known numbers (=N) of <br />reproducing adults. For the Colorado squawflsh we could perhaps assume 5 <br />populations of 500 reproducing adults each, bearing in mind that the uncertainty <br />regarding population size will be one source of error. <br />Twenty or more private alleles are required for the estimate, the number of <br />individuals from each population and the number of loci from each individual <br />necessary to achieve this will depend upon the mutation rate. With higher mutation <br />rates fewer individuals and loci will be needed (also, to sample more loci fewer <br />individuals would be required and vice~versa) <br /> <br />One problem is that the pattern of gene flow within the Colorado squawfish is <br />uncertain. If downstream larval dispersal is followed by movement up a random <br />reach, then the application of an island model of migration may be justified. If, <br />however, individuals generally return to their natal area and gene flow only comes <br />about by the occasional stray adult, most likely to end up in an adjacent population, <br />the migration pattern will be more one dimensional (see Figure A.2). <br />