My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7742
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7742
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:55:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7742
Author
Gilpin, M.
Title
A Population Viability Analysis of the Colorado Squawfish in the Upper Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
A Report to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Squawfish Population Viability Analysis --July 1993 <br /> <br />Page 22 <br /> <br />(see the preceding demographic analysis). With adult population size <br />greater than 1000 (cf. Tyus 1991) and only 10 or so generations since <br />western man began significantly to disturb the system, the expected loss of <br />heterozygosity through drift is miniscule. Based on these numbers it is <br /> <br />Ht=lO = <br /> <br />(l-(1/(2 * 1000))) 10 <br /> <br />= <br /> <br />.999510 <br /> <br />= .995, <br /> <br />or a 0.5% loss. Accepting the 5% H value of Ammerman and Morizot <br />(1989), the year 1800 value would have been 5.025%. <br /> <br />2.7 Selection on the Colorado Squawfish <br /> <br />Selection is a different matter. There is perhaps no other endangered <br />species living is such an altered environment. The Colorado squawfish <br />now experiences different water flow regimes, a different prey base, <br />different competitors and predators on the its juvenile stage, different <br />limits to its migration. Assuming some genetically based variation in traits <br />involved with these various interfaces to its environment, the Colorado <br />squawfish is almost certainly evolving "better" adaptations to its new <br />environment. If this selection were solely on the juveniles and acted in a <br />"soft" manner, i.e., not affecting A, then this evolution could be quite <br />rapid. However, this is not likely to be the case, and the Colorado <br />squawfish will probably remain maladapted to its current environment for <br />centuries. <br /> <br />It would have been extremely valuable if Powell and the early explorers of <br />the Colorado basin had done a thorough genetic sample of the Colorado <br />squawfish. Sadly, their government funding had a different focus. <br />Without a 'before' baseline, it is impossible to quantify genetic change. <br />Possibly, museum samples could be assayed, but this would only go back a <br />few generations. <br /> <br />2.8 Are There Genetic Subunits? <br /> <br />The Colorado squawfish has already gone extinct in v~ous upper reaches <br />(above dams) and the lowest reaches of its range (below Lake Powell). It <br />is extremely unlikely that the current distribution, centered on the Green <br />River (see Figure 2.2), will show genetic differentiation. This figure is <br />based on CRFP data from 1978-1989 (supplied by Chuck McAda) and also <br />on independent data for the same time period for the Colorado river from <br />Moab to just beyond Grand Junction (also supplied in tabular form by <br />Chuck McAda). These numbers represent all subadult and adult Colorado <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.