Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Squawfish Population Viability Analysis --July 1993 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />Q.) <br />= <br />- <br />~ <br />> <br />Q.) <br />> <br />'.:;3 <br />u <br />= <br />"0 <br />e <br />0.. <br />Q.) <br />~ <br /> <br />Figure 1.2 <br /> <br /> <br />Age <br /> <br />Future reproductive output ceases to be worth as much, as it must be <br />discounted by a higher adult mortality rate. This higher rate is the sum of <br />natural mortality plus human harvest mortality. This has the effect of <br />changing the optimal life history. Probably, a fish is "better off' by <br />reproducing earlier and with greater effort, even if this effort slows <br />growth and places physiological stress on the organism that shows up as <br />even further increases in adult mortality. But such an evolutionary <br />adjustment takes very long periods of time, especially with an organism <br />with as long a generation time as the squawfish. Doubtless, the life history <br />and consequent demography of the Colorado Squawfish must be considered <br />out of equilibrium with its current ecological situation. That is, the <br />demographic rates that prevail today must largely reflect the evolutionary <br />compromises attained by the species before modern man entered the <br />Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />1.8 Data for a Demographic Analysis. <br /> <br />The central database utilized for life history analysis was the 1400 record <br />CRFP database that covers the years from 1978 to 1989 (obtained from <br />Chuck McAda at the USFWS field station in Grand Junction, Colorado). <br />Other sources of data could shade provisional judgments drawn from these <br />data. The CRFP database is not everything that one would like, but it is <br />