Laserfiche WebLink
<br />was visually and by touch estimated as silt (< 0.12 mm), sand <br /> <br /> <br />(0.12 - 1 mm), gravel (1 - 64 mm), and cobble (> 64 mm). Cover <br /> <br /> <br />was recorded as presence or absence of woody debris. With the <br /> <br /> <br />exception of cover, the nine measurements were averaged to give <br /> <br /> <br />mean depth, velocity, and percent coverage of substrate types for <br /> <br />each habitat. <br /> <br /> <br />Habitat availability was measured within each study site to <br />characterize seasonal and spatial differences. Measurements were <br />taken along 10 equally spaced transects at the wider sites (3 and <br />4) and 20 equally spaced transects at the narrower sites (1 and. <br />2). Depth, velocity, and substrate measurements were made at <br />equidistant points along each transect to give a total of 100 <br />data points per site. <br /> <br />Data analysis.-To account for ontogenetic shifts in habitat use <br /> <br /> <br />we categorized the most common species into three age-groups: <br /> <br />larvae, juvenile, sub-adult/adult (Table 1). Only juveniles of <br /> <br /> <br />rare species were considered because numbers of adults and larvae <br /> <br /> <br />did not allow for statistical comparisons. The separation <br /> <br /> <br />between larvae and juveniles was made at the approximate size at <br /> <br /> <br />which a species acquired its full complement of fin rays. The <br /> <br /> <br />upper size for juveniles was determined using length-frequency <br /> <br /> <br />histograms and was approximately the maximum size the species <br /> <br />attained through the first winter of life. For small-bodied <br /> <br /> <br />species (Cyprinella lutrensis, Pi~ephales promelas, and <br /> <br /> <br />Rhinichthys osculus), any specimen larger than a juvenile was <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />11 <br />