My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8173
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8173
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:55:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8173
Author
Gido, K. B. and D. L. Propst.
Title
Habitat Use and Association of Native and Nonnative Fish in the San Juan River, New Mexico and Utah.
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />was visually and by touch estimated as silt (< 0.12 mm), sand <br /> <br /> <br />(0.12 - 1 mm), gravel (1 - 64 mm), and cobble (> 64 mm). Cover <br /> <br /> <br />was recorded as presence or absence of woody debris. With the <br /> <br /> <br />exception of cover, the nine measurements were averaged to give <br /> <br /> <br />mean depth, velocity, and percent coverage of substrate types for <br /> <br />each habitat. <br /> <br /> <br />Habitat availability was measured within each study site to <br />characterize seasonal and spatial differences. Measurements were <br />taken along 10 equally spaced transects at the wider sites (3 and <br />4) and 20 equally spaced transects at the narrower sites (1 and. <br />2). Depth, velocity, and substrate measurements were made at <br />equidistant points along each transect to give a total of 100 <br />data points per site. <br /> <br />Data analysis.-To account for ontogenetic shifts in habitat use <br /> <br /> <br />we categorized the most common species into three age-groups: <br /> <br />larvae, juvenile, sub-adult/adult (Table 1). Only juveniles of <br /> <br /> <br />rare species were considered because numbers of adults and larvae <br /> <br /> <br />did not allow for statistical comparisons. The separation <br /> <br /> <br />between larvae and juveniles was made at the approximate size at <br /> <br /> <br />which a species acquired its full complement of fin rays. The <br /> <br /> <br />upper size for juveniles was determined using length-frequency <br /> <br /> <br />histograms and was approximately the maximum size the species <br /> <br />attained through the first winter of life. For small-bodied <br /> <br /> <br />species (Cyprinella lutrensis, Pi~ephales promelas, and <br /> <br /> <br />Rhinichthys osculus), any specimen larger than a juvenile was <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.