My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8173
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8173
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:55:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8173
Author
Gido, K. B. and D. L. Propst.
Title
Habitat Use and Association of Native and Nonnative Fish in the San Juan River, New Mexico and Utah.
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />late summer-autumn when flows are low and species abundances are <br /> <br /> <br />high. At this time, native and nonnative juveniles, <br /> <br /> <br />particularly, may compete for resources. <br /> <br /> <br />The majority of the species and age-classes of San Juan <br /> <br /> <br />River fish that we examined occupied similar low velocity, <br /> <br /> <br />shallow to moderate depth, silt-bottomed habitats. Coevolved <br /> <br /> <br />stream fish assemblages have typically been reported to have <br /> <br /> <br />relatively high levels of resource partitioning (Gorman and Karr <br /> <br /> <br />1978; Ross 1986) indicating structured assemblages. The fish <br /> <br /> <br />assemblage on the San Juan River, however, is a combination of <br /> <br /> <br />native and nonnative species with a brief history of sympatry in <br /> <br /> <br />a modified environment. Thus, the stability of these <br /> <br /> <br />associations is equivocal because of the short evolutionary time <br /> <br /> <br />'this assemblage has been together and overlap in resource use may <br /> <br /> <br />reduce the fitness of interacting species. <br /> <br /> <br />Our ability to detect habitat overlap may have been effected <br /> <br /> <br />by the spatial scale of sampling. The sampling scale we used <br /> <br /> <br />(<300m study sites) was too small to detect large scale patterns <br /> <br /> <br />of habitat partitioning caused by environmental factors that vary <br /> <br /> <br />on the level of stream reach (e.g., conductivity, temperature, <br /> <br /> <br />river gradient). Additionally, differences among sites in <br /> <br />available habitat (Table 3) may result in reach level variation <br /> <br /> <br />in the fish assemblage. Thus, because we pooled data from all <br /> <br /> <br />sites, a negative association in habitat use may be attributed to <br /> <br /> <br />reach level habitat characteristics rather than differences on <br /> <br /> <br />the scale of individual habitats. Our intent, however, was to <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.