Laserfiche WebLink
<br />large number of significant positive associations between <br />juvenile R. osculus and nonnatives, the magnitude was small and <br />significance was probably a consequence of large sample size. <br />Significant negative association occurred between R. osculus and <br /> <br /> <br />adult ~. lutrensis, and ~. discobolus and E. zebrinus. <br /> <br /> <br />Adult and sub-adult native species showed the lowest degree <br /> <br /> <br />of habitat overlap with nonnative species (Fig. 7). Among these, F <br /> <br /> <br />sub-adult ~. latipinnis had the greatest number of significant <br /> <br /> <br />positive associations with nonnative species. Adult R. osculus <br /> <br /> <br />had a significant positive association with adult ~. lutrensis <br /> <br /> <br />while it had a significant negative association with juvenile ~. <br /> <br /> <br />promelas and ~. affinis. <br /> <br /> <br />Ictalurus punctatus, E. zebrinus, and A. melas showed <br /> <br /> <br />negligible association with native fish species. Sub-adult~. <br /> <br /> <br />discobolus had no significant association with any other <br /> <br /> <br />nonnative species and the observed overlap was greater than <br /> <br /> <br />expected for only two of the eleven comparisons. <br /> <br /> <br />When sample size was sufficiently large, we also assessed <br /> <br /> <br />the habitat associations between native and nonnative species <br /> <br /> <br />using Spearman's rank correlation (Table 6). Significant '-Co <br /> <br /> <br />positive correlations in abundance of larval natives and <br /> <br /> <br />nonnatives only occurred between larval ~. discobolus and <br /> <br /> <br />juvenile ~. promelas, ~. lutrensis, and~. carpio. Abundance of <br /> <br /> <br />larval ko latipinnis showed a significant negative correlation <br /> <br /> <br />with juvenile ~. promelas and larval ~o lutrensis. Thus, even <br /> <br /> <br />though there was a significant positive association among these <br /> <br />13 <br />