My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8173
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8173
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:55:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8173
Author
Gido, K. B. and D. L. Propst.
Title
Habitat Use and Association of Native and Nonnative Fish in the San Juan River, New Mexico and Utah.
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />difficult and inefficient in deep, rapid velocity habitats and <br />our experience indicated that few fish occupied deep, high <br />velocity habitats (Gido et al., in press). <br />The majority of the species and age-classes examined used <br />low velocity (<0.2 m/s), shallow (<0.4 m) habitats (Table 2) . <br />Silt was the predominant substrate in most habitats sampled, <br />while cobble substrata occurred less frequently. Debris was <br />present in 23.0% of the habitats occupied by fish. Adult E. <br />osculus and sub-adult ~. discobolus occupied habitats with higher <br />current velocities than other species. Adult C. lutrensis, <br />juvenile Ictalurus punctatus, and sub-adult ~. discobolus and ~. <br />latipinnis commonly occupied habitats with depths >0.35m. <br />Stepwise discriminant analysis indicated that velocity, <br />depth, and percent coverage of silt and sand significantly <br />contributed towards discriminating habitat use between the 20 <br />species and age-classes (Table 5). Current velocity and depth, 1r~ <br />however, were considerably more important than other variables. <br />The first axis loaded positively on velocity and negatively on <br />silt, while the second axis contrasted velocity with depth. <br />Species centroids plotted on the first two axes indicated that <br />adult age-classes of both native and common nonnative species <br />used habitats with higher current velocities (Fig. 3). On the F~ <br />second axis, the age-classes of the two common nonnative species <br />also appeared to use slightly deeper water than the respective <br />age-class of native species. Although the overall model was <br />significant, it only classified groups correctly 17.2% of the <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.