My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8173
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8173
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:55:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8173
Author
Gido, K. B. and D. L. Propst.
Title
Habitat Use and Association of Native and Nonnative Fish in the San Juan River, New Mexico and Utah.
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />occurred. A chi-square test statistic was used to determine if <br />this proportion was greater or less than expected. The expected <br />frequency was simply the proportion of the total seine hauls in <br /> <br /> <br />which the nonnative species/age-class was captured. For example, <br /> <br /> <br />if juvenile Q. lutrensis was present in 50% of the total seine <br /> <br /> <br />hauls, it would be expected to occur in 50% of the seine hauls <br /> <br /> <br />where native ~. latipinnis occurred. A Bonferroni corrected <br /> <br /> <br />alpha level was used because of the large number of comparisons <br /> <br />(n=99) . <br /> <br />Spearman's rank correlations were calculated to determine if <br /> <br /> <br />the abundance of species pairs was positively or negatively <br /> <br /> <br />correlated across habitats. Because a large number of habitats <br /> <br /> <br />had only one of the species/age-class present we only considered <br /> <br /> <br />those habitats where both were present (Ludwig and Renyolds <br /> <br /> <br />1988). Thus, for many of the less-common species there were low <br /> <br /> <br />sample sizes (<5 comparisons); these were omitted from the <br /> <br /> <br />analysis. <br /> <br /> <br />Variation in habitat availability and habitat sampled among <br /> <br /> <br />seasons and sample sites was examined using a Kruskal-Wallis <br /> <br /> <br />test. If significant differences were found, pair-wise <br /> <br /> <br />comparisons by sites were tested using Wilcoxon sign ranks test <br /> <br /> <br />and P-value was adjusted using a Bonferroni correction (Sokal and <br /> <br /> <br />Rohlf 1995). Seasons were divided into the four calendar seasons <br /> <br /> <br />of the year. Additionally, differences in habitat variables were <br /> <br /> <br />tested between habitat available and that sampled using Wilcoxon <br /> <br /> <br />sign ranks test. All calculations were computed using SPSS v7.0 <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.