Laserfiche WebLink
<br />nATER POLICY AND DEVELOFMENT OF THE COLORADO RIVER <br /> <br />The Nile <br /> <br />The Colorado and Nile rivers nave often been compared, <br />especially in terms of drainage patterns and use. Both rivers <br />originate in snow-melt streams in mountains high above the <br />desert through which the convergent waters Jlust 1'lo'l'l to the <br />sea. The drain~ge area of the Colorado is large, but because <br />of the high evaporation rates and the sheer distance through <br />the desert, the final flow is a mere trickle coru;ared to its <br />potential. However, the river is highly unpredictable and <br />subject to flash flooding fro~ both snow melt in the mountains <br />and infrequent torrential storms char3cteristic of tne desert. <br />Like ti:le Hile, the Colorado does not flo;.; througn just a <br />sand desert, but through a desert that is a storehouse of <br />nutrients and rich soil that wants onlJ for hater. Thus, tae <br />Colorado becomes a substitute for rain. <br />Three problems are readily identified: 1) small Nater <br />flow for a potentially large area, 2) unpredictable flooding <br />in the lower regions and 3) excessive slit-sand load of the <br />river. One other problem, unicue to t~e Colorado, is that <br />the river is e~trenched in sheer canyons through a great major- <br />ity of its course. (1 ,3,4,6) <br /> <br />-1- <br />