My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9307 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9307 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:54:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9307
Author
Germaine, S. S.
Title
Relationships of Birds, Lizards, and Nocturnal Rodents to Their Habitat in the Greater Tucson Area, Arizona.
USFW Year
1995.
USFW - Doc Type
Phoenix, AZ.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RELATIONSHIPS OF BIRDS, LIZARDS, AND NOCTURNAL RODENTS TO THEIR HABITAT IN TUCSON, ARIZONA <br />instead of the MSE when assessing the potential <br />error in the predictive ability of this model in the <br />future. This difference was only slight, however, <br />and there was no difference between the slopes of <br />the predictive and predicted models (P = 0.902). <br />Species richness for the native breeding bird <br />indicator guild (INDG) was positively correlated <br />with percent area upper Sonoran vegetation and <br />undisturbed washes, and negatively correlated <br />with house density and percent area of: paved or <br />graded land; urban, open, non-native vegetation <br />cover; and the 3 distance measures. The best <br />predictive equation for indicator guild included <br />house density, percent area paved or graded, <br />percent area urban, open, non-native vegetation <br />cover, and percent area upper Sonoran vegetation: <br />R = 1.359 - 0.219(HDEN) + 0.211(LTROM) + <br />0.185(RIPU). <br />This model (F = 7.65; df = 4, 118; P <0.001), <br />had a multiple correlation coefficient of 0.54, and <br />explained 21% of the variation in lizard species <br />richness. <br />INDG = 1.584 - 0.200(HDEN) - 0.010(PCTP) - <br />0.008(UROE) + 0.003(LJSV}. <br />This model (F = 119.93; df = 4, 316; P < 0.000), <br />had a multiple correlation coefficient of 0.78, and <br />explained 60% of the variation in indicator guild. <br />Cross validation revealed that the MSPR (0.246) <br />was smaller than the MSE (0.495), indicating that <br />this model gives an unbiased estimation of it's <br />predictive ability. Again, there was no difference <br />between the slopes of the predictor and the test <br />data sets (P = 0.148). <br />Lizards. Lizard community total abundance <br />(1~ was negatively correlated with house density, <br />and urban-open exotic vegetation (Table 6). Total <br />abundance was positively correlated with percent <br />area lower Sonoran vegetation and undisturbed <br />wash cover. The best predictive regression <br />equation incorporated lower Sonoran vegetation <br />and undisturbed riparian: <br />N = 1.175 + 0.022(LSV) + 0.047(RIPU). <br />This model (F = 22.01; df = 3, 119; P <0.001), <br />had a multiple correlation coefficient of 0.60, and <br />explained 36% of the total variation in lizard <br />community abundance. <br />Lizard species richness (R) was weakly <br />correlated with 4 habitat variables (Table 6). <br />Species richness correlated negatively with house <br />density, and urban-open exotic vegetation. Species <br />richness correlated positively with percent area <br />mixed urban open cover, and undisturbed <br />riparian. The best predictive equation for lizard <br />species richness included house density, urban- <br />open mixed vegetation, and undisturbed riparian: <br />STEPHEN S GERMAINE 1995 ARIZONA GAME ~r FISH DEPARTMENT, TECH. REP. 20 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.