My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9628
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9628
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:36:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9628
Author
Gloss, S. P., J. E. Lovich and T. S. Melis.
Title
The State of the Colorado River Ecosystem in Grand Canyon - A Report of the Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center 1991-2004.
USFW Year
2005.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />populations are also examined. The chapter concludes <br />with a discussion of possible management options to <br />slow or reverse the decline of humpback chub numbers. <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />The Colorado River was one of the last areas of the <br />continental United States to be explored by Europeans; it <br />was first traversed during the expedition headed by John <br />Wesley Powell in 1869. For this reason, it is not surpris- <br />ing that scientific descriptions of many of the organisms <br />in the Colorado River corridor, especially the fishes, <br />did not begin until the 1930s and 1940s; earlier expe- <br />ditions collected and described fishes generally rather <br />than specifically. Emery and Ellsworth Kolb, explorers <br />and photographers of the Colorado River in the early <br />1900s, reported that fishes were very abundant (Kolb <br />and Kolb, 1914). The humpback chub was the last of <br />the native fishes in Grand Canyon to be described in <br />1946 by Robert R. Miller from specimens taken from the <br />Colorado River in Grand Canyon (Miller, 1946). <br />Scientific description or the native fishes or Grand <br />Canyon showed that these species were unique in at least <br />two ways. Most noticeably, several of the species share <br />unusual body shapes, including large adult body size, <br />small depressed skulls, large predorsal humps or keels, <br />and small eyes, which presumably developed as adapta- <br />tions to life in a large, turbid, and seasonably variable <br />riverine environment. These features are perhaps best <br />observed in the razorback sucker (Xyrauchen lexanus) and <br />the humpback chub (see accompanying text box, p. 51). <br />A second, and perhaps more important, measure <br />of the uniqueness of Grand Canyon native fishes is that <br />most of these species are not found elsewhere in the <br />world. Organisms that are native to a certain location <br />and do not occur anywhere else are called endemic spe- <br />cies. Of the eight native species common to the Grand <br />Canyon, six are species endemic to the Colorado River <br />Basin. As early as 1895, scientists recognized the special <br />nature of Colorado River fishes and the high rates of <br />endemism (Minckley, 1991). Later research did not alter <br />this conclusion, and despite a relatively low number <br />of species compared to other drainages in the United <br />States, the Colorado River Basin has a recognized ende- <br />mism at the species level of approximately 75% and sup- <br />ports the most distinctive ichthvofauna in North America <br />(l'vIinckley, 1991). . <br />Before European settlement, the native fishes found <br />in the Grand Canyon portion of the Colorado River <br />were exclusively minnows and suckers. The biggest of <br /> <br />Fishes of Grand Canyon 35 <br /> <br />these fish was the Colorado pikeminnow (PtycllOclzdlus <br />lucius), which is also the largest of all native minnow <br />(cyprinid) species in North America and was found <br />only in the Colorado River Basin (fig. I). Called a white <br />salmon by early settlers, the Colorado pikeminnow <br />reached up to 6 ft (2 m) in length and had a weight of up <br />to 80 Ib (36 kg) (Mueller and Marsh, 2002). <br />Today, three of the eight native fish species have <br />been eliminated from the Colorado River in Glen and <br />Grand Canyons (roundtail chub (Gila robusla), bony tail <br />chub (Gila elegans), and Colorado pikeminnow), and two <br />are federally listed as endangered (humpback chub and <br />razorback sucker) under the Endangered Species Act. <br />Although listed as an endangered species with designated <br />critical habitat in Grand Canyon, the razorback sucker <br />has rarely been collected (Minckley, 1991; Valdez and <br />Carothers, 1998) and is widely thought to no longer be <br />found in Grand Canyon. The status of the flannelmouth <br />sucker (Caloslomus lalipinnis) is common, and the species <br />persists in the study area and throughout much of the <br />upper Colorado River Basin. The remaining two fish <br />(bluehead sucker (Caloslomus disco bolus) and speckled dace <br />(Rlziniclzlfrys osculus)) are relatively common. Brief descrip- <br />tions of the life histories of all the Grand Canyon native <br />fishes can be found in Minckley (1991); this chapter <br />provides text boxes (see p. 50) with summary information <br />for the four native fishes that continue to inhabit Grand <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 1. Historical photograph (date unknown) of someone <br />identified as James Fagen holding a large Colorado pikeminnow in <br />lower Granite Gorge (courtesy of the Kolb Collection, Cline Library, <br />Northern Arizona University, NAU.PH.568.57371. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.