My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9628
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9628
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:36:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9628
Author
Gloss, S. P., J. E. Lovich and T. S. Melis.
Title
The State of the Colorado River Ecosystem in Grand Canyon - A Report of the Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center 1991-2004.
USFW Year
2005.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />24 The State of the Colorado River Ecosystem in Grand Canyon <br /> <br />contradicts the approach of the EIS, where it was <br />assumed that sand transport was regulated only by <br />the discharge of water. <br /> <br />. Topping and others (2000b) showed through <br />their analysis of the 1965-70 daily sediment- <br />transport data collected by USGS that, under <br />normal powerplant flows, newly input tributary <br />sand is exported past the Grand Canyon gaging <br />station within several months. Their analysis of <br />predam data indicated that, prior to closure of <br />Glen Canyon Dam, sand would accumulate in <br />Marble and upper Grand Canyons only during the <br />9 mo of the year when discharges were typically <br />lower than about 9,000 cfs. <br /> <br />. Measurements of the channel bed indicate that <br />tributary sand, which is typically much finer than <br />the sand on the bed of the Colorado River, accu- <br />mulates on the bed for only a short time before <br />being eroded and transported out of the canyon <br />under normal MLFF dam operations (Topping <br />and others, 2000a). <br /> <br />. Since August 1999, detailed suspended-sediment <br />transport measurements have been collected at <br />the Paria and Little Colorado Rivers to document <br /> <br /> 331 <br />E <br />B 328 <br />co <br />-0 <br />CI:l <br />> <br />0 <br />.0 <br />co 325 <br />... <br />CI:l <br />~ <br />C <br />0 Completion of <br />.." 322 ----+ <br />co <br />> Glen Canyon Dam <br />CI:l <br />w <br /> 318 <br /> 1900 1925 1950 1975 2000 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 5. A decrease in elevation of the sandbar surface is <br />seen at Jackass Creek camp located along the left shore of the <br />Colorado River, 23 mi (37 km) downstream of Glen Canyon Dam. <br />Elevations were determined by examining oblique and aerial <br />photographs of the site and by field survey of the elevation and <br />the former sand surface at its contact with large talus blocks. This <br />graph shows the elevations near one prominent talus block that <br />was inundated by predam mean annual floods, but since the dam <br />was completed, the talus block has been inundated infrequently <br />(modified from Rubin and others, 2002). <br /> <br /> <br />700,000 <br /> <br />600,000 <br /> <br />U <br />ID <br />'" <br />ro <br />'" <br />> <br />ID <br />~ <br />ID <br />ID <br />~ <br />ID <br />= <br />ro <br />ID <br />'" <br />ro <br />= <br />u <br />'0 <br />> <br />~ <br /><= <br />ro <br />~ <br /> <br />500,000 <br /> <br />~ 400,000 <br /> <br />ro <br />ro <br />~ <br />~ 300,000 <br />'" <br /> <br />200,000 <br /> <br />100,000 <br /> <br />1992 <br /> <br />1994 <br /> <br />2002 <br /> <br />1996 <br /> <br />1998 <br /> <br />2000 <br /> <br />Figure 6. Changes in sandbar size (total surface area) are shown <br />for 14 long-term sandbar study sites between the Lees Ferry and <br />Grand Canyon gages (RM 0 to RM 87). Area of bars exposed <br />above water discharges of 8,000 cfs decreased by 22% from 1991 <br />to 2004. The 1996 beach/habitat-building flow resulted in a net <br />transfer of sand from mid elevations to high elevations (modified <br />from Rubin and others, 2002). <br /> <br />inputs and at the USGS gaging stations above <br />the mouth of the Little Colorado River and near <br />Grand Canyon to document export. Initially, <br />these quasi-daily measurements were made by <br />using only conventional USGS methodologies <br />to obtain cross-sectionally integrated samples <br />of suspended-sediment concentration and grain <br />size (methods described in Edwards and Glysson, <br />1999). Because substantial and rapid (within a <br />day) changes that are due to tributary inputs can <br />occur in suspended-sediment concentration and <br />grain size, emerging technologies for continuous <br />monitoring of suspended-sediment concentra- <br />tion and grain size were tested and implemented <br />beginning in 200 I. These technologies include <br />acoustic backscatter and laser-diffraction methods <br />and are described in detail in Melis and oth- <br />ers (2004) and Topping and others (2004). The <br />detailed sediment-transport measurements allow <br />for the ability to construct sediment budgets <br />based on continuous data instead of on rating <br />curves, a very important distinction from the <br />EIS approach of using a limited data set. These <br />data show that the overall mass balance of sand <br />(input minus export) continues to be negative <br />(fig. 7), as originally predicted by Laursen and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.