My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9628
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9628
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:36:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9628
Author
Gloss, S. P., J. E. Lovich and T. S. Melis.
Title
The State of the Colorado River Ecosystem in Grand Canyon - A Report of the Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center 1991-2004.
USFW Year
2005.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />The closure of Glen Canyon Dam and the begin- <br />ning of flow regulation of the Colorado River through <br />Grand Canyon in 1963 all but eliminated the mainstem <br />sand supply to Grand Canyon and substantially altered <br />the seasonal pattern of flows in the Colorado River. <br />Dam-induced changes in both sand supply and flow have <br />altered the sedimentary processes that create and main- <br />tain sandbars and related habitats, resulting in smaller <br />and coarser grained deposits throughout the ecosystem. <br />From the perspective of river management, the <br />ecological implications associated with such changes <br />are not well understood and are the focus of ongoing <br />integrated science studies. The effects of Glen Canyon <br />Dam operations on fine-sediment resources (i.e., sand <br />and finer material), particularly the erosion and restora- <br />tion of sandbars, are of interest because sandbars are a <br />fundamental element of the Colorado River's geomor- <br />phic framework and the landscape of Grand Canyon <br />(see Webb, 1996; Webb and others, 2002). Sandbars <br />are also of interest in terms of the essential role fine- <br />sediment resources play in other ecosystem processes <br />(U.S. Department of the Interior, 1995). For example, <br />emergent sandbars create terrestrial habitats for ripar- <br />ian vegetation and associated fauna. Similarly, sandbars <br />create areas of stagnant or low-velocity flow that may <br />be used as rearing habitat by the endangered humpback <br />chub (Gila 0'Plza) and other native fish. Recreational river <br />runners and other backcountry visitors frequently use <br />sandbars as campsites. Finally, abundant sand and silt <br />deposits near and above the elevation of typical predam <br />floods contain archeological resources and protect those <br />resources from weathering and erosion. <br />Conservation of Grand Canyon's fine-sediment <br />resources is a primary environmental goal of the Glen <br />Canyon Dam Adaptive .Management Program. Despite <br />this fact, the dam's hydroelectric powerplant operation <br />under the Record of Decision (U.S. Department of <br />the Interior, 1996) continues to erode the limited fine- <br />sediment deposits that exist downstream. Changes in <br />the abundance, distribution, size, and composition of <br />sandbars began to occur under the no action period (his- <br />torical operations) of dam operation from 1963 through <br />1991. Sandbar erosion continued despite changes in <br />the operation of the dam that resulted from the imple- <br />mentation of the interim operating criteria in 1991 and <br />the modified low fluctuating flow CMLFF) alternative in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.