My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9628
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9628
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:36:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9628
Author
Gloss, S. P., J. E. Lovich and T. S. Melis.
Title
The State of the Colorado River Ecosystem in Grand Canyon - A Report of the Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center 1991-2004.
USFW Year
2005.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />8 The State of the Colorado River Ecosystem in Grand Canyon <br /> <br />Table 1. Glen Canyon Dam release prescriptions under the modified low fluctuating flow alternative (ets = cubic feet <br />per second). <br /> <br />Monthly release Minimum Maximum Allowable daily Uprampl <br />volume <br />(acre-feet) release (cfs)! release (cfs) fluctuation (cfs) downramp (cfs/hr) <br /><600,000 8,000/5,000 25,000 5,000 4,000/1,500 <br />600,000-800,000 8,000/5,000 25,000 6,000 4,000/ I ,500 <br />>800,000 8,000/5,000 25,000 8,000 4,000/1,500 <br /> <br />I 8,000 cfs between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. and 5,000 cfs at night; releases each weekday during the recreation season (Easter to Labor Day) would <br />average not less than 8,000 CEi lor the period from 8 a.m. to midnight. <br /> <br />was concern for the effects on sensitive resources such as <br />sediment or endangered species. <br />On the basis of significant scientific research since <br />1995, some of the assumptions about how Colorado <br />River resources would respond to ROD operations have <br />been modified or rejected. As a result, several additional <br />experimental flows that temporarily modified Glen <br />Canyon Dam ROD operations have been implemented <br />since 2000. Additional experimental flows discussed else- <br />where in this report include the 2000 low summer steady <br />flow (LSSF) test, the 2003-05 experimental fluctuating <br />nonnative fish suppression flows, and the November <br />2004 experimental high flow. The LSSF test included <br /> <br />1966 National Historic <br />Preservation Act passed <br /> <br />1968 Colorado River <br />Basin Project Act passed <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />two habitat maintenance flows (31,000 cfs for 4 d) in <br />spring and late summer, with June through August flows <br />held constant at 8,000 cfs. Fluctuating nonnative fish <br />suppression releases allowed the flow of the river to fluc- <br />tuate daily between 5,000 cfs and 20,000 cfs with relaxed <br />hourly upramp and downramp rates of 5,000 and 2,500 <br />cfslh, respectively, from January to l\ifarch. In summer <br />and fall 2004, fine-sediment inputs from the Paria River <br />(15 mi below the dam) reached the agreed-upon levels for <br />triggering an experimental high flow of 41,000 cfs for 2.5 <br />d (see chapter I, this report). <br />Experimentation has largely focused on experimental <br />flows of the type described above to achieve downstream <br /> <br />1970 Long-range Operating <br />Criteria developed for Glen <br />Canyon Dam operations <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />1967 Humpback chub and Colorado <br />pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius) <br />federally listed as endangered <br /> <br /> <br />1969 National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 <br />passed requiring Federal agencies to consider the <br />environmental impacts of their proposed actions <br />and reasonable alternatives to those actions <br /> <br />'. ' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.