Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Grams and Schmidt 20 <br /> <br />does not have a direct influence on channel geometry and slope. However, because the <br />detailed profile of the alluvium-bedrock interface is not known, the possibility remains <br />that the present longitudinal profIle is inherited from the profile established when the river <br />did flow in contact with bedrock. Maintenance of an inherited profIle would occur only if <br />the river had aggraded the same amount everywhere. An adjusted profile would exist if <br />differential aggradation had occurred; borehole data show that depth to bedrock and <br />therefore aggradatio.n since the river flo.wed in contact with bedrock has no.t been the same <br />throughout all the canyo.ns. Aggradation may have occurred in response to a change in <br />mainstem hydro.logy fo.llo.wing deglaciation o.f the surro.unding mo.untains or a change in <br />tributary sediment delivery by debris flo.ws. Moreover, the o.bserved relatio.n between <br />debris fans and slope indicates that steep-gradient reaches are related to. high debris-fan <br />frequency. As sediment accumulated in the canyons, slope increased until streamflo.W <br />competence matched the characteristics of tributary supply. The gravel bars with the <br />largest mean particle sizes occur in the reaches of highest flood-flow average bo.undary <br />shear stress. <br />Reworking o.f gravel bars and downstream transport of coarse-grained alluvium <br />probably o.ccurs during floods o.f about a pre-regulation 10 yr recurrence interval in the <br />modern climate. Observations of lithologies contained in gravel bars SUPPo.rt the <br />'conclusio.n that gravel is rarely transported through the study reach under either the current <br />regulated streamflow regime or the historic unregulated streamflow regime. The <br />litho.logic compositio.n o.f gravel bars should reflect the distribution o.f litho.Io.gies o.f all <br />upstream debris-contributing tributaries, no.t just the immediately upstream tributary basin <br />if gravel was being transPo.rted thro.ugh the canyons. Our limited investigatio.n of <br />lithologies contained in two. debris fan-gravel bar pairs indicates that gravel bars are, in <br />fact, do.minated by the resistant litholo.gy mo.st abundant in the tributary basin immediately <br />upstream. If attritio.n were the dominant process we Wo.uld expect to. fmd a do.wnstream <br />fining of lithologies that did tlQt occur. Thus in the debris-fan do.minated canyons where <br /> <br />" <br />