My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8255
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8255
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 12:34:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8255
Author
Grams, P. E. and J. C. Schmidt.
Title
Geomorphology of the Green River in the Eastern Uinta Mountains, Colorado and Utah.
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
Logan, Utah.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Grams and Schmidt <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />streamflow. Cutbanks created by the Green River and tributary streams show that debris <br />fans are poorly sorted, matrix. supported diamictons with angular to sub-rounded, pebble <br />to boulder-sized clasts; the matrix is clay to coarse sand. <br />Eddy bars form in zones of recirculating flow that occur downstream from channel <br />constrictions. Figure 4 is a detailed map of a single fan-eddy complex in Lodore Canyon. <br />Debris fans are the most common cause of channel constrictions, but talus slopes, bedrock <br />outcrops, and gravel bars occasionally cause flow separation and eddy deposition. <br />Although distinct separation and reattachment bars do occur in the canyons of the eastern <br />Uinta Mountains, the eddy bar shown in Figure 4 is more typical. This bar extends the full <br />length of the eddy, from separation to reattachment point; this distance is typically on the <br />order of 1 to 3 channel widths. The area of fine-grained deposition is not limited to a <br />secondary eddy cell, which is typical of separation bars, and the bar lacks a distinct return <br />current channel, distinguishing it from a classic Grand Canyon reattachment bar. This <br />lack of eddy bar differentiation within eddies resembles the tendency described by <br />Schmidt and Rubin (1995) for separation and reattachment bars to appear 'merged' under <br />unregulated flow conditions where sediment transport rates are high. Excavations in <br />undifferentiated eddy bars reveal upstream and onshore migrating dunes and climbing <br />ripples, confIrming deposition in a recirculating-flow environment. Reworking by wave <br />.-action typically forms multiple river-parallel ridges and swales. <br />Expansion bars. are generally about 1 to 3 channel widths in length and form in <br />areas of flow expansion downstream from debris-fan created constrictions and associated <br />expansions (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4). These deposits occur in association with eddy deposits and <br />debris fans, but are located downstream from the eddy and in downstream-directed <br />current. Expansion bars are always gravelor gravel-cored with a veneer of fme-grained <br />alluvium. <br />Channel-mariPn bars are narrow strips of alluvium that may be several channel- <br />widths long and usually OCCll!"..in straight reaches of relatively uniform downstream flow. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.